The "hearing aid effect" 2005: A rigorous test of the visibility of new hearing aid styles

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 169-175

  Johnson, Carole E ^a   Danhauer, Jeffrey L ^b   Gavin, Reid B ^a   Karns, Summer Raye ^a   Reith, Amber C ^a   Lopez, Ilian Priscilla ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Open ear hearing aids; Stigma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; STIGMA; VISIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33751237059     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/019)     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abrams, H., Hnath-Chisolm, T., & Block, M. (2004). The effects of signal processing and style on perceived value of hearing aids. The Hearing Review, 11(13), 16, 18-21, 70.
2. Blood, G. W., Blood, I., & Danhauer, J. L. (1977). The hearing aid effect. Hearing Instruments, 28(6), 12.
3. Blood, G. W., Blood, I., & Danhauer, J. L. (1978). Listeners' impressions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 513-518.
4. Danhauer, J. L., Blood, G. W., Blood, I., & Gomez, N. (1980). Professional and lay observers' impressions of pre-schoolers wearing hearing aids. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 415-422.
5. Danhauer, J. L., Johnson, C., Kasten, R., & Brimacombe, J. (1985). The hearing aid effect: Summary conclusions & recommendations. The Hearing Journal, 38(3), 12-14.
6. Dengerink, J. E., & Porter, J. B. (1984). Children's attitudes towards peers wearing hearing aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 47, 205-209.
7. Doggett, S., Stein, R. L., & Gans, D. (1998). Hearing aid effect in older females. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9, 361-366.
8. Johnson, C. E., & Danhauer, J. L. (1982). Attitudes towards severely hearing-impaired geriatrics with and without hearing aids. Australian Journal of Audiology, 4, 41-45.
9. Johnson, C. E., & Danhauer, J. L. (1997a). CIC instruments: Cosmetic issues. In M. Chasin (Ed.), CIC Handbook (pp. 151-167). San Diego, CA: Singular.
10. Johnson, C. E, & Danhauer, J. L. (1997b). The "hearing aid effect" revisited: Can we meet the needs of cosmetically sensitive patients? High Performance Hearing Solutions, 1, 37-44.
11. Johnson, C. E., Danhauer, J. L., & Edwards, R. G. (1982). The "hearing aid effect" on geriatrics-Fact or fiction? Hearing Instruments, 33(10), 21, 24, 36.
12. Kochkin, S. (1994). MarketTrak IV: Impact of purchase intent of cosmetics, stigma, and style of hearing instrument. The Hearing Journal, 47(9), 29-36.
13. Mueller, H. G., & Ebinger, K. A. (1996). CIC hearing aids: Potential benefits and fitting benefits. Seminars in Hearing, 17(1), 61-80.
14. Mulac, A., Danhauer, J. L., & Johnson, C. E. (1983). Young adults' and peers' attitudes towards elderly hearing aid wearers. Australian Journal of Audiology, 5, 57-62.
15. Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The hearing inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear and Hearing, 3, 128-134.
16. Vol, L. M., & Jones, C. H. (1998). CICs: Five years later, what have we learned? The Hearing Review, 5(4), 8, 10, 12.