Commentaries

Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 89-101

  Pavitt, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751233750     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781950241.00014     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Adams, J.D. (2001), 'Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers', National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8292, http://www.nber.org/papers/w8292.
2. Arundel, A. and A. Geuna (2001), 'Does proximity matter for knowledge transfer from public institutes and universities to firms?', Brighton: SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, October.
3. Branscomb, L. (1998), 'From science policy to research policy', in L.M. Branscomb and J.H. Keller (eds), Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 112-39.
4. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1990), 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128-52.
5. David, P. (1997), 'The knowledge factory: a survey of universities', The Economist, 4 October, 2-22.
6. Feldman, M.P. (2000), 'Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration', in G.L. Clark, M. Gertler and M.P. Feldman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 373-94.
7. Feller, I. (1999), 'The American university system as a performer of basic and applied research', in L.M. Branscomb, F. Kodama and R. Florida (eds), Industrializing Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 65-101.
8. Gilpin, R. (1962), American Scientists and Nuclear Weapons Policy, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
9. Lundvall, B.-Å. and P. Maskell (2000), 'Nation states and economic development:from national systems of production to national systems of knowledge creation and learning', in G.L. Clark, M. Gertler and M.P. Feldman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch. 18.
10. Mowery, D. (2002), 'The changing role of universities in the 21st century US R&D system', in A.H. Teich, S.D. Nelson and S.J. Lita (eds), AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2002, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, Part 7, available at www.aaas.org/spp/yearbook/ 2002/Ch.2S.pdf.
11. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1996), 'Special Theme: The Knowledge-based Economy', in Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 1996, Paris: OECD, pp. 229-56.
12. OECD Secretariat (2000), 'Trends in university-industry research partnerships', STI Review 23, 39-65.
13. Pavitt, K. (1991), 'What makes basic research economically useful?', Research Policy 20(2), 109-19.
14. Pavitt, K. (2001), 'Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn)', Industrial and Corporate Change 10(3), 761-79.
15. Rosenberg, N. and R.R. Nelson (1994), 'American universities and technical advance in industry', Research Policy 23(3), 323-48.
16. Senker, J. (1995), 'Tacit knowledge and models of innovation', Industrial and Corporate Change 4(2), 425-47.
17. Stokes, D.E. (1997), Pasteur's Quadrant, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.