The use of peer evaluations in group projects: Benefits, applications, and what students think of them

Hospitality and Tourism Educator

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 44-46

  Getty, Juliet M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751227679     PISSN: 23298758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23298758.1996.10685759     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Brody, C. M. (1995). Collaborative or cooperative learning? Complimentary practices for instruc-tional reform. The Journal of Staff, Program, & Organization Development, 12(3), 133-143.
2. Ferris, W, & Hess, P. (1985). Peer evaluation of stu-dent interaction in organizational behavior and other courses. The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 5(4), 74-82.
3. Gelina, R. J. (1993). Continuous quality improve-ment. Ames, IA: Center for Continuous Quality Improvement.
4. Hall, E. J, Mouton, J. S., & Blake, R. R. (1963). Group problem solving effectiveness under conditions of pooling versus interaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 59,155-174.
5. Pfeiffer, J. W. (Ed.). (1991). The encyclopedia of team- development activities. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer & Company.
6. Reynolds, J. S., & Vlisides, C. E. (1993). Student group dynamics: Strategies for achieving suc-cessful group projects. Hospitality & Tourism Educator, 5(4), 59-60, 65.
7. Scannell, E. E., & Newstrom, J. W. (1991). Still more games trainers play. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
8. Teegarden, J. W. (1995). Use technology to unleash the potential of your wuality improvement teams. Quality Progress, 29(10), 111-114.
9. Upchurch, R. S. (1995). Enhancing critical thinking: Using microtheme strategies in the classroom. Hospitality and Tourism Educator, 7(3), 5-8, 65.