Rubidium impurity diffusion in a poly(ethylene oxide)-sodium iodide polymer electrolyte

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 110, Issue 45, 2006, Pages 22496-22502

  Obeidi, Shahmahmood ^a   Stolwijk, Nicolaas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALI METALS; AMORPHOUS MATERIALS; IONIC CONDUCTION; RADIOISOTOPES; RUBIDIUM; SODIUM COMPOUNDS;

DIFFUSIVITY; NEUTRAL ION PAIRS; RADIOTRACER DIFFUSION; SODIUM IODIDE;

POLYELECTROLYTES;

EID: 33751219534     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp064105l     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boden, N.; Leng, S. A.; Ward, I. M. Solid State Ionics 1991, 45, 261.
2. Arumugam, S.; Shi, J.; Tunstall, D. P.; Vincent, C. A. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1993, 5, 153.
3. Chadwick, A. V.; Strange, J. H.; Worboys, M. R. Solid State Ionics 1983, 9-10, 1155.
4. See also, Bridges, C.; Chadwick, A. V. Solid State Ionics 1988, 28-30, 965.
5. Fauteux, D.; Lupien, M. D.; Robitaille, C. D. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1987, 134, 2761.
6. Stolwijk, N. A.; Obeidi, Sh. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 125901.
7. Obeidi, Sh.; Zazoum, B.; Stolwijk, N. A. Solid State Ionics 2004, 173, 77.
8. Obeidi, Sh.; Stolwijk, N. A.; Pas, S. J. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 10750.
9. Philibert, J. Atom Movements - Diffusion and Mass Transport in Solids; Les Éditions de Physique: Les Ulis, France, 1991
10. Stolwijk, N. A.; Obeidi, Sh. Diffus. Defect Data, Pt. A 2005, 237. 1004.
11. 2 and 0.2 wt % CaO. These contaminai inns, which are inherent to the manufacturing process, are present in the form of small particles. See also, Suarez, S.; Abbrent, S.; Greenbaum, S. G.; Shin, J. H.; Passerini, S. Solid State Ionics 2004, 166, 407.
12. Lonergan, M. C.; Shriver, D. F.; Ratner, M. A. Electrochim. Acta 1995, 40, 2041.
13. Voss, S.; Divinski, S.; Imre, A. W.; Mehrer, H.; Mundy, J. N. Solid State Ionics 2005, 176, 1383.
14. Bonpunt, L.; Chanh, N. B.; Comberton, G.; Haget, Y.; Beniere, F. Radiat. Eff. 1983, 75, 33.
15. Bruce, P. G.; Vincent, C. A. Solid State Ionics 1990, 40-41, 607.
16. Stolwijk, N. A. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 42, 5793.
17. 30NaI, the consideration of electrostatic interactions must go beyond the application of (extended) Debye - Hückel theory. See, for instance, Pai, S. J.; Bae, Y. C.; Sun, Y. K. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A864. In this first report on impurity diffusion in a polymer electrolyte system, we refrain from such a complex analysis, also because the pertaining activity coefficients may only be slightly different from unity and rather weakly dependent on temperature.
18. 2
19. Furukawa, T.; Mukasa, Y.; Suzuki, T. Kano, K J. Polym. Sci., Part B 2002, 40, 613.
20. Dürr, O.; Dieterich, W.; Nitzan, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 12732.
21. 5,6 However, the differences are not significant within the pertaining experimental errors and statistical uncertainties.
22. Rb in Figure 3 represents not only the "simple" fit to the Rb data alone (based on eq 12) but also the more elaborate fit involving both self-ion and Rb data (based on eqs 9-12). The minor differences between the two fitting curves are not visible in Figure 3.
23. q, which have opposite curvatures in an Arrhenius plot (cf. Figure 6).
24. 0 ±100% corresponds to uncertainty factors of 2 (high bound) and 1/2 (low bound).
25. Ratner, M. A.; Nitzan, A. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1989, 88, 19.
26. Schantz, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 6296.
27. Stolwijk, N. A.; Wiencierz, M.; Obeidi, Sh. Faraday Discuss. 2007, 134; doi: 10.1039/b602143n