A survey of neurologists on bothersome patient behaviors

MedGenMed Medscape General Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2006, Pages

  Evans, Randolph W ^a,b,c   Evans, Rochelle E ^d   Evans, Richard I ^e  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEDICAL STAFF; MOBILE PHONE; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; VERBAL HOSTILITY; WORK SCHEDULE; BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PHYSICIAN;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEHAVIOR; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 33751208928     PISSN: 15310132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kolata G. When the doctor is in but you wish he weren't. New York Times. November 30, 2005.
2. Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet. 1994;343:1609-1613. Abstract
3. Daniel AE, Burn RJ, Horarik S. Patients' complaints about medical practice. Med J Aust. 1999;170:598-602. Abstract
4. Bendapudi NM, Berry LL, Frey KA, Parish JT, Raybum WL. Patients' perspectives on ideal physician behaviors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:338-344. Abstract
5. Toiviainen HK, Vuorenkoski L, Hemminki E. Physicians' opinions on patients' requests for specific treatments and examinations. Health Expect. 2005;8:43-53. Abstract
6. Ferber D. Don't be a pill. Women's Health. September 2006:98-99.
7. Kellenman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:61-67.
8. Evans RW, Lipton RB, Ritz KA. A survey of neurologists on self-treatment and treatment of their families. Headache. In press.
9. Murdock A, Rodgers C, Lindsay H, Tham TC. Why do patients not keep their appointments? Prospective study in a gastroenterology outpatient clinic. J R Soc Med. 2002;95:284-286. Abstract
10. Maloney S, Ilic D, Green S. Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:382-385. Abstract
11. Cheung BK, Morze CJ, Jones MA, Venkatesh B. Information on the Internet about head injury pertaining to intensive care: less quantity and more quality is needed. Crit Care Resusc. 2006;8:100-106. Abstract
12. Hildebrandt DE, Westfall JM. Reasons for after-hours calls. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:567-569. Abstract
13. Sorum PC, Mallick R. Physicians' opinions on compensation for telephone calls. Pediatrics. 1997;99:E3.
14. Hildebrandt DE, Westfall JM, Fernald DH, Pace WD. Harm resulting from inappropriate telephone triage in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19;437-442. Abstract
15. Lill MM, Wilkinson TJ. Judging a book by its cover: descriptive survey of patients' preferences for doctors' appearance and mode of address. BMJ. 2005;331:1524-1527. Abstract
16. McKinstry B. Should general practitioners call patients by their first names? BMJ. 1990;301:795-796.
17. Carson AJ, Stone J, Warlow C, Sharpe M. Patients whom neurologists find difficult to help. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:1776-1778. Abstract