Sequential diagnosis in the independence Bayesian framework

Soft Computing

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 118-125

  McSherry, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hypothetico deductive reasoning; Na ve bayes; Sequential diagnosis; Test selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751198941     PISSN: 14327643     EISSN: 14337479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-002-0252-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. de Kleer J, Williams BC (1987) Diagnosing multiple faults, Artificial Intelligence 32: 97-130
2. Gorry GA, Kassirer JP, Essig A, Schwartz WB (1973) Decision analysis as the basis for computer-aided management of acute renal failure, Amer J Med 55: 473-484
3. McSherry D (1997) Hypothesist: a development environment for intelligent diagnostic systems. In: Keravnou E, Garbay C, Baud R, Wyatt J (Eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. LNAI, Vol. 1211. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 223-234
4. McSherry D (2001) Interactive case-based reasoning in sequential diagnosis, Appl Intelligence 14: 65-76
5. Adams ID, Chan M, Clifford PC et al (1986) Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study, Br Med J 293: 800-804
6. Provan GM, Singh M (1996) Data mining and model simplicity: a case study in diagnosis. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, pp. 57-62
7. McSherry D (1986) Intelligent dialogue based on statistical models of clinical decision making, Stat Med 5: 497-502
8. McSherry D (1999) Dynamic and static approaches to clinical data mining, Artificial Intelligence Med 16: 97-115
9. Elstein AS, Schulman LA, Sprafka SA (1978) Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
10. Kassirer JP, Kopelman RI (1991) Learning clinical reasoning. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland
11. Shortliffe EH, Barnett GO (1990) Medical data: their acquisition, storage and use. In: Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE (Eds) Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, pp. 37-69
12. McSherry D (2000) A case study of strategic induction: the roman numerals data set. In: Bramer M, Preece A, Coenen F (Eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVII. Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 48-61
13. Breslow LA, Aha DW (1997) Simplifying decision trees: a survey, Knowledge Eng Rev 12: 1-40
14. Doyle M, Cunningham P (2000) A dynamic approach to reducing dialog in on-line decision guides. In: Blanzieri E, Portinale L (Eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. LNAI, Vol. 1898. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 49-60
15. McSherry D (2001) Minimizing dialog length in interactive case-based reasoning. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 993-998
16. McSherry D (1997) Avoiding premature closure in sequential diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence Med 10: 269-283
17. Cendrowska J (1998) PRISM: an algorithm for inducing modular rules. Int J Man-Machine Studies 27: 349-370
18. Quinlan JR (1998) Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning 1: 81-106
19. Szolovits P, Pauker SG (1978) Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence 11:115-144
20. McSherry D (2001) Explanation of attribute relevance in decision-tree induction. In: Bramer M, Coenen F, Preece A (Eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVIII. Springer-Verlag, London pp. 39-52
21. Bohanec M, Bratko I (1994) Trading accuracy for simplicity in decision trees, Machine Learning 15: 223-250
22. Berry DC, Broadbent DE (1987) Expert systems and the man-machine interface, part two: the user interface. Expert Syst 4: 18-28
23. Elkan C (2001) The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 973-978