Survey of parental willingness to pay and willingness to stay for "painless" intravenous catheter placement

Pediatric Emergency Care

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 699-703

  Walsh, Brooks Myrick ^a,c   Bartfield, Joel Michael ^b  

^a ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Intravenous; Parent; Procedural pain

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY WARD; ETHNOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INCOME; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MOTHER; PARENTAL CONSENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; VEIN CATHETERIZATION;

ADULT; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ANTI-ANXIETY AGENTS; CATHETERIZATION; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; DATA COLLECTION; DRUG COSTS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCOME; INFANT; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; NEW YORK; PAIN; PARENTS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TRAUMA CENTERS;

EID: 33751195514     PISSN: 07495161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000238743.96606.69     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Singer AJ, Richman PB, Kowalska A, et al. Comparison of patient and practioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency procedures. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:652-658.
2. Kaseman S. Using evidence-based practice to create a venous access team. J Pediatr Nurs. 2002;17:450-454.
3. Humphrey GB, Boon CM, van Linden van den Heuvell GF, et al. The occurrence of high levels of acute behavioral distress in children and adolescents undergoing routine venipunctures. Pediatrics. 1992;90:87-91.
4. Cummings EA, Reid GJ, Finley GA, et al. Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatients. Pain. 1996;68:25-31.
5. Polkki T, Pietila AM, Rissanen L. Pain in children: qualitative research of Finnish school-aged children's experiences of pain in hospital. Int J Nurs Pract. 1999;5:21-28.
6. Duff AJA. Incorporating psychological approaches into routine paediatric venepuncture. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:931-937.
7. Brown J. Registered nurses' choices regarding the use of intradermal lidocaine for intravenous insertions: the challenge of changing practice. Pain Manag Nurs. 2002;3:71-76.
8. May K, Britt R, Newman MM. Pediatric registered nurse usage and perception of EMLA. J Soc Pediatr Nurs. 1999;4:105-112.
9. Dennis AR, Leeson-Payne CG, Langham BT, et al. Local anaesthesia for cannulation. Has practice changed? Anaesthesia. 1995;50:400-402.
10. Norris WD. The use of local anaesthesia in peripheral venous cannulation: current practice of junior doctors. J R Nav Med Serv. 2002;88:62-64.
11. Walco GA, Cassidy RC, Schechter NL. Pain, hurt, and harm. The ethics of pain control in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:541-544.
12. Nelson DS, Hoagland JR 3rd, Kunkel NC. Costs of sedation using oral midazolam: money, time, and parental attitudes. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000;16:80-84.
13. Gall O, Annequin D, Ravault N, et al. Relative effectiveness of lignocaine-prilocaine emulsion and nitrous oxide inhalation for routine preoperative laboratory testing. Paediatr Anaesth. 1999;9:305-310.
14. Yamamoto LG, Young LL, Roberts JL. Informed consent and parental choice of anesthesia and sedation for the repair of small lacerations in children. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15:285-289.
15. Brown J. Using lidocaine for peripheral i.v. insertions: patients' preferences and pain experiences. Medsurg Nurs. 2003;12:95-100.