How much can part-of-speech tagging help parsing?

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 373-389

  Dalrymple, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS; DATA STRUCTURES;

PARSING; PART-OF-SPEECH TAGGING; PERFECT TAGGER; TAG SEQUENCE;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33751194843     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324905004079     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alshawi, H. (editor) (1992) The Core Language Engine. MIT Press.
2. Bangalore, S. and Aravind Joshi (1999) Supertagging: An approach to almost parsing. Computational Linguistics, 25(2): 237-266.
3. Butt, M., Dyvik, H., King, T. H., Masuichi, H. and Rohrer, C. (2002) The Parallel Grammar Project. Proceedings of COLING-2002 Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation.
4. Charniak, E., Carroll, G., Adcock, J., Cassandra, A., Gotoh, Y., Katz, J., Littman, M. and McCann, J. (1996) Taggers for parsers. Artificial Intelligence, 85(1-2).
5. Clark, S. and Curran, J. R. (2004) The importance of supertagging for wide-coverage CCG parsing. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING2004), Geneva.
6. Copperman, M. and Segond, F. (1996) Computational grammars and ambiguity: The bare bones of the situation. In: M. Butt and T. H. King (editors), The Proceedings of the LFG '96 Conference. Rank Xerox, Grenoble. URL http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/1/lfg1.html.
7. Dalrymple, M. (2001) Lexical Functional Grammar. Volume 34 of Syntax and Semantics. Academic Press.
8. Dalrymple, M., Kaplan, R. M., Maxwell, J. T. III and Zaenen, A. (editors) (1995) Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar. CSLI Publications.
9. Elworthy, D. (1995) Tagset design and inflected languages. From Texts to Tags: Issues in Multilingual Text Analysis. ACL SIGDAT Workshop, Dublin.
10. Kaplan, R. M. and Bresnan, J. (1982) Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In: J. Bresnan (editor), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 173-281. MIT Press.
11. Kaplan, R. M. and King, T. H. (2003) Low-level markup and large-scale LFG grammar processing. In: M. Butt and King, T. H (editors), On-line Proceedings of the LFG2003 Conference. URL http:// csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/8/lfg3.html.
12. King, T. H., Crouch, R., Riezler, S., Dalrymple, M. and Kaplan, R. M. (2003) The PARC 700 dependency bank. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora. Budapest.
13. Marcus, M., Kim, G., Marcinkiewicz, M. A., MacIntyre, R., Bies, A., Ferguson, M., Katz, K. and Schasberger, B. (1994a) The Penn treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop.
14. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B. and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1994b) Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2): 313-330.
15. Maxwell, J. T. III and Kaplan, R. M. (1993) The interface between phrasal and functional constraints. Computational Linguistics, 19(4): 571-590.
16. Maxwell, J. T. III and Kaplan, R. M. (1996) An efficient parser for LFG. In: M. Butt and King, T. H (editors), On-line Proceedings of the LFG96 Conference. URL http://esli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/1/lfg1.html.
17. Oepen, S., Toutanova, K., Shieber, S., Manning, C., Flickinger, D. and Brants, T. (2002) The LinGO Redwoods treebank: Motivation and preliminary applications. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING2002), Taipei.
18. Prins, R. and van Noord, G. (2001) Unsupervised POS-tagging improves parsing accuracy and parsing efficiency. IProceedings of 7th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, Beijing.
19. Prins, R. and van Noord, G. (2003) Reinforcing parser preferences through tagging. Traitement automatique des langues. Special issue on Evolutions in Parsing (to appear).
20. Pulman, S. (1992) Using tagging to improve analysis efficiency. In: H. Thompson (editor), SALT/ELSNET Workshop on Sub-Language Grammar and Lexicon Acquisition for Speech and Natural Language Processing. Record of verbal presentation.
21. Riezler, S., King, T. H., Kaplan, R. M., Crouch, R., Maxwell, J. T. III and Johnson, M. (2002) Parsing the Wall Street Journal using a Lexical-Functional Grammar and discriminative estimation techniques. IProceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Philadelphia.
22. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D. and Singer, Y. (2003) Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. HLT-NAACL.
23. Toutanova, K., Manning, C., Shieber, S., Flickinger, D. and Oepen, S. (2002) Parse disambiguation for a rich HPSG grammar. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, pp. 253-263.
24. van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979) Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. Butterworth-Hienemann.
25. Voutilainen, A. (1998) Does tagging help parsing? A case study on finite-state parsing. Finite-State Methods in Natural Language Processing.
26. Wauschkuhn, O. (1995) The influence of tagging on the results of partial parsing in German corpora. 4th International Workshop in Parsing Technologies. Prague.