Little Higgs models and T parity

Pramana - Journal of Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 813-820

  Perelstein, Maxim ^a  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond the standard model; Electroweak symmetry breaking

Indexed keywords

COLLIDING BEAM ACCELERATORS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BEYOND THE STANDARD MODELS; ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY BREAKING; LITTLE HIGGS MODELS; T PARITY;

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS;

EID: 33751194439     PISSN: 03044289     EISSN: 03044289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12043-006-0094-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. M Schmaltz and D Tucker-Smith, arXiv:hep-ph/0502182
2. M Perelstein, arXiv:hep-ph/0512128
3. Particle Data, Group: S Eidelman et al, Phys. Lett. B592, 1 (2004)
4. D B Kaplan and H Georgi, Phys. Lett. B136, 183 (1984)
5. D B Kaplan, H Georgi and S Dimopoulos, Phys. Lett. B136, 187 (1984)
6. The collective symmetry breaking mechanism was first gleaned by Arkani-Hamed, Cohen and Georgi [6] from a study of five-dimensional theories through the application of the dimensional deconstruction approach [7]
7. N Arkani-Hamed, A G Cohen and H Georgi, Phys. Lett. B513, 232 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0105239
8. N Arkani-Hamed, A G Cohen and H Georgi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4757 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0104005
9. N Arkani-Hamed, A G Cohen, E Katz and A E Nelson, JEEP 0207, 034 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0206021
10. C Csaki, J Hubisz, G D Kribs, P Meade and J Terning, Phys. Rev. D67, 115002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0211124
11. J L Hewett, F J Petriello and T G Rizzo, JHEP 0310, 062 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0211218
12. M C Chen and S Dawson, Phys. Rev. D70, 015003 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311032
13. For analyses including the constraints from LEP2 experiments, see R Barbieri, A Pomarol, R Rattazzi and A Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B703, 127 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405040
14. G Marandella, C Schappacher and A Strumia, Phys. Rev. D72, 035014 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0502096
15. Z Han and W Skiba, Phys. Rev. D72, 035005 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506206
16. C Csaki, J Hubisz, G D Kribs, P Meade and J Terning, Phys. Rev. D68, 035009 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0303236
17. M Perelstein, M E Peskin and A Pierce, Phys. Rev. D69, 075002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310039
18. H C Cheng and I Low, JHEP 0309, 051 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0308199;
19. JHEP 0408, 061 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0405243
20. I Low, JHEP 0410, 067 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0409025
21. J Hubisz and P Meade, Phys. Rev. D71, 035016 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0411264
22. The only exception occurs in the top sector, where the SM top quark and the T mix at the tree level resulting to deviations of the top couplings from their SM values. At present, this does not constrain the model, due to the limited experimental precision on observables involving the top quark. However, these effects are likely to become observable at the LHC and the ILC [17]
23. C F Berger, M Perelstein and F Petriello, arXiv:hep-ph/0512053
24. J Hubisz, P Meade, A Noble and M Perelstein, JHEP 0601, 135 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0506042
25. M Asano, S Matsumoto, N Okada and Y Okada, arXiv:hep-ph/0602157
26. A Birkedal, A Noble, M Perelstein and A Spray, arXiv:hep-ph/0603077
27. T Han, H E Logan, B McElrath and L T Wang, Phys. Rev. D67, 095004 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0301040
28. G Azuelos et al, Euro. Phys. J. C39S2, 13 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0402037