Improved estimates of environmental copper release rates from antifouling products

Biofouling

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 279-291

  Finnie, Alistair A ^a  

^a International Paint Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antifouling paint; Copper; Environmental risk assessment; Release rate; Test methods

Indexed keywords

COPPER; PAINT;

ABLATION; ANTIFOULING PAINT; COPOLYMERS; COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HULLS (SHIP); RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANTIFOULING AGENT; COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; HULL; NAVAL APPLICATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIP TECHNOLOGY;

CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIP; WATER POLLUTION;

COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MATERIALS TESTING; PAINT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIPS; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33751192268     PISSN: 08927014     EISSN: 10292454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927010600898862     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Anderson C, Atlar M, Callow M, Candries M, Townsin RL. 2003. The development of foul-release coatings for seagoing vessels. J Mar Des Operations 84:11-23.
2. Anon. 1952. Marine fouling and its prevention. Annapolis: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. 388 pp.
3. Anon. 2002. Effective Interswift® 655 features elements of two different technologies. Propeller 14:4-5. Available from http://www. international-marine.com
4. Arias S. 1999. Round robin test for antifouling paints. Eur Coatings J March 1999:122-128.
5. ASTM. 1990. Standard test method for organotin release rates of antifouling coating systems in sea water, ASTM Method D 5108-90, 6 pp.
6. ASTM. 2002. Standard practice for dealing with outlying observations, ASTM Method E 178-02, 17 pp.
7. ASTM. 2005. Standard test method for determination of copper release rate from antifouling coatings in substitute ocean water, ASTM Method D 6442-05, 9 pp.
8. Callow ME. 1986. A world-wide survey of slime formation on antifouling paints. In: Evans LV, Hoagland KD, editors. Algal biofouling. Studies in Environmental Science, Vol. 28. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp 1-20.
9. CEPE. 2003. Provision of biocide leaching rate data for antifouling products: a discussion document from the Anti-Fouling Working Group of CEPE. In: Emission scenario document on antifouling products: Annex, Environment Directorate of the organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005. Available from http://www.oecd.org
10. de la Court HF, de Vries HJ. 1973. The leaching mechanism of cuprous oxide from antifouling paints. J Oil Chem Assoc 56:388-395.
11. European Commission. 2003. Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances. Available from http://ecb..jrc.it/Technical- Guidance_Document
12. European Commission. 2004. European Commission Director-General Environment, Harmonisation of environmental emission scenarios: an emission scenario document for antifouling products in OECD countries, final report. Available from http://ecb.jrc.it/Documents/Biocides/ENVIRONMENTAL_ EMISSION_SCENARIOS
13. Finnie A, Haslbeck E. 2006. The development of ISO and ASTM standards for measuring antifouling biocide release rates. In: Proc 3rd Int Symp Prevention of Pollution from Ships, Shipyards, Drydocks, Ports and Harbors, Nov. 5-7, 2003. New Orleans: ATRP Corporation, Virginia, paper 7.
14. Hampton TW, Chadwick DB. 2000. Quantifying in situ metal contaminant mobility in marine sediments. Surface Warfare Systems San Diego Technical Report 1826. 142 p. Available from US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.
15. Haslbeck E, Ellor JA. 2005. Investigating tests for antifoulants: variation between laboratory and in situ methods for determining copper release rates from navy-approved coatings. J Protect Coat Linings August 2005:34-44.
16. Haslbeck EG, Holm ER. 2005. Standard methods: tests on leaching rates from antifouling coatings reveal high level of variation in results among laboratories. Eur Coatings J October 2005:26-31.
17. ISO. 2000a. Determination of the release rate of biocides from antifouling paints - Part 1: General method for extraction of biocides. International Standard ISO 15181-1: 2000.
18. ISO. 2000b. Determination of the release rate of biocides from antifouling paints - Part 2: Determination of copper-ion concentration in the extract and calculation of the release rate. International Standard ISO 15181-2: 2000.
19. Kaznoff AI, Rudroff JG. 2000. Anti-fouling coatings in the US Navy. In: Proc PCE Conference and Exhibition, Genoa, Italy, March 8-10, 2000, Technology Publishing. pp 329-438.
20. Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K, Weinell CE, Pedersen MS. 2002a. Seawater soluble pigments and their potential use in self-polishing antifouling paints: simulation-based screening tool. Prog Org Coatings 45:423-434.
21. Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K, Weinell CE, Pedersen MS, Codolar SA. 2002b. Dynamic simulations of a self-polishing antifouling paint exposed to seawater. J Coatings Technol 74(929):45-54.
22. Kyriakidis K. 2005. Baroclinicity, forcing mechanism and prediction of chemical propagation of San Diego Bay and their effects on naval applications. Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, pp 8-10. Available from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA 93943.
23. Lewis JA, Baran IJ. 1993. Biocide release rates from antifouling coatings. Oebalia 19:449-456.
24. Lieberman SH, Homer V, Seligman PF. 1985. In situ determination of butyltin release rates from antifouling coatings on navy test ships. Naval Oceans Center Technical Report 1027. 43 pp. Available from US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.
25. Lindner E. 1993. Dynamic and static exposure tests and evaluations of alternative copper-based antifoulant coatings. Surface Warfare Systems San Diego Technical Report 1628. 96 p. Available from US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.
26. Mihm JW, Loeb GI. 1988. The effect of microbial biofilms on organotin release by an antifouling paint. Biodeterioration 7:309-314.
27. Naval Sea Systems Command, US Department of the Navy, Office of Water - US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Draft characterization analysis report hull coating leachate, August 2003. Available from http://www.epa.gov/owow/ oceans/regulatory/unds/hullcoating
28. Omae I. 2003. General aspects of tin-free antifouling paints. Chem Rev 103:3431-3448.
29. Schatzberg P. 1996. Measurement and significance of the release rate for tributyltin. In: Champ MA, Seligman PF, editors. Organotin. London: Chapman Hall. pp 383-403.
30. Schiff K, Diehl D, Valkirs A. 2004. Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels. Mar Pollut Bull 48:371-377.
31. Seligman PF, Neumeister JW inventors; The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, assignee. In situ leach measuring system. US Patent 4375451, 1983 March 1.
32. Stein J, Truby K, Darkangelo-Wood C, Takemori M, Vallance M, Swain G, Kavanagh C, Kovach B, Schultz M, Wiebe D, Holm E, Montemarano J, Wendt D, Smith C, Meyer A. 2003. Structure-property relationships of silicone biofouling-release coatings: effect of silicone network architecture on pseudo-barnacle attachment strengths. Biofouling 19:87-94.
33. Thomas KV. 2001. The environmental fate and behaviour of antifouling paint booster biocides: a review. Biofouling 17:73-86.
34. Thomas K, Raymond K, Chadwick J, Waldock M. 1999. The effects of short-term changes in environmental parameters on the release of biocides from antifouling coatings: cuprous oxide and tributyltin. Appl Organometal Chem 13:453-460.
35. Turley PA, Fenn RJ, Ritter JC, Callow ME. 2005. Pyrithiones as antifoulants: environmental fate and loss of toxicity. Biofouling 21:31-40.
36. US Department of Defense. 2005. QPL-24647-9, Qualified products list of products qualified under performance specification MIL-PRF-24647 Paint system, anticorrosive and antifouling, ship hull. Available from http://portal. nstcenter.com
37. Valkirs AO, Davison BM, Kear LL, Fransham RL, Zirino AR, Grovhoug JG. 1994. Environmental effects from in-water cleaning of ablative copper antifouling coatings. Naval Command Control and Ocean Surveillance Center RDT&E Division San Diego, Technical Document 2662. 82 p. Available from US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.
38. Valkirs AO, Seligman PF, Haslbeck E, Caso JS. 2003. Measurement of copper release rates from antifouling paint under laboratory and in situ conditions: implications for loading estimation to marine water bodies. Mar Pollut Bull 46:763-779.
39. Van Hattum B, Baart A, Boon J. 2005. Emission estimation and chemical fate modelling of antifoulants. In: The handbook of environmental chemistry, Vol. 5. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
40. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. 2004. Antifouling technology - past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coatings 50:75-104.
41. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K, Weinell CE. 2006a. Mathematical modelling of tin-free chemically-active antifouling paint behaviour. AIChE Journal 52:1926-1940.
42. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Weinell CE, Dam-Johansen K. 2006b. Presence and effects of marine microbial films on biocide-based antifouling paints. Biofouling 22:33-41.
43. Zirino A, Seligman PF. 2002. Copper chemistry, toxicity, and bioavailability and its relationship to regulation in the marine environment: Office of Naval Research Workshop Report, Surface Warfare Systems San Diego Technical Document 3140. 97 p. Available from US Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.