A critical assessment of concurrent planning in New York State

Adoption Quarterly

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1-22

  Gerstenzang, Sarah ^a   Freundlich, Madelyn ^a  

^a Children's Rights   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751172983     PISSN: 10926755     EISSN: 1544452X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J145v08n04_01     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Annie E. Casey Foundation, (no date). Shortening children's stays. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation Family to Family Initiative.
2. Barth, R.P., Courtney, M., Berrick, J.D., & Alpert, V. (1994). From child abuse to permanency planning: Child welfare services pathways and placements. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
3. Bayless, L. & Craig-Oldsen, H.L. (1999). Model approach to Partnerships in Parenting: Leader's guide. Atlanta, GA: Child Welfare Institute.
4. Brennan, K., Szolnoki, J., & Horn, M. (2003). Lutheran Community Services concurrent planning evaluation: Stuart Foundation final report. Seattle, WA: University of Washington School of Social Work.
5. D'Andrade, A.C., Choice, P., Martin, M., Berrick, J.D., & Austin, M.J. (2000). Concurrent planning: The influence of bypass and poor prognosis indicators on child welfare outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Social Services Consortium.
6. Dougherty, S. (2001). Toolbox #2: Expanding the role of foster parents in achieving permanency. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
7. Katz, L., Spoonmore, N., & Robinson, C. (1994). Concurrent planning: From permanency planning to permanency action. Seattle, WA: Lutheran Social Services of Washington and Idaho.
8. Lutz, L.L. (2001). Concurrent planning: Survey of selected sites. New York: Hunter College School of Social Work.
9. Lutz, L.L. (2003). Achieving permanence for children in the child welfare system: Pioneering possibilities amidst daunting challenges. New York: Hunter College School of Social Work.
10. Lutz, L.L. & Greenblatt, S.B. (2001). Dual licensure of foster and adoptive families: Evolving best practices. New York: Hunter College School of Social Work.
11. Mallon, G. (2003). A new look at concurrent planning. Child Law Practice, 22 (6), 98-99.
12. Maluccio, A.N., Fein, E., & Olmstead, K.A. (1985). Permanency planning for children. New York: Tavistock Pulications.
13. Martin, M., D'Andrade, A., Choice, P., Berrick, J.D., & Austin, M.J. (1999). Concurrent planning for timely permanence: The influence of children's characteristics, prognosis indicators, and agency staff perceptions. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Social Services Consortium.
14. McCarthy, J., Marshall, A., Collins, J., Arganza, G., Deserly, K., & Milon, J. (2003). A family's guide to the child welfare system. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development.
15. Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2001). Evaluating concurrent permanency planning: Report on outcomes and fiscal impact. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Family and Children's Services Division.
16. Mitchell, L.B., Barth, R.P., Green, R., Wall, A., Biemer, P., Duerr Berrick, J., Bruce Webb, M., and the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being Research Group (2005). Child Welfare Reform in the United States: Findings from a Local Agency Survey. Child Welfare, Vol. LXXXIV, 1, January/February.
17. Monck, E., Reynolds, J., & Wigfall, V. (2003). The role of concurrent planning: Making permanent placements for young children. London: British Association for Adoption & Fostering.
18. National Adoption Information Clearinghouse. (1994). Foster parent adoption: What professionals should know. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information.
19. National Adoption Information Clearinghouse. (2002). Child abuse and neglect state statute series ready reference-Permanency planning: Concurrent Planning. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information.
20. Neff, M.A. (2000). Best practices: Empowerment-oriented permanency planning: A handbook for caseworkers. New York: Michael A. Neff, P.C.
21. New York State Office of Children & Family Services. (2000). Informational Letter: ASFA Safety and Permanency. Albany, NY: Author.
22. New York State Office of Children & Family Services. (2003). New York State Pro-, gram Improvement Plan for the Child and Family Services Federal Review. Albany, NY: Author.
23. New York State Office of Children & Family Services. (2004). Foster care basics. On-line at: http://www.ocfs.state.ny.us/main/fostercare/overview. asp#role, retrieved, December 16, 2004.
24. Ninth Annual Report to the Colorado Legislature, Implementation of HB 94-1178 Expedited Permanency Planning. (2003). On file with authors.
25. North American Council on Adoptable Children. (2002).A handbook for training concurrent permanency planning resource parents in Minnesota. St. Paul. MN: Author.
26. Padgett, D. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Pecora, P.J., Whittaker, J.K., Maluccio, A.N., & Bartli, R.P. (2000). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
28. Schcne, P. (1998). Expedited permanency planning in Colorado. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Human Services
29. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children's Bureau. (2003). Time between TPR and finalization. Washington, DC: Author.