Reading to write: Self-regulated learning strategies when writing essays from sources

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 365-383

  Risemberg, Rafael ^a  

^a Keane College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751142726     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388079609558221     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bandura, A., &Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41,586-598.
2. Bandura, A. (1977) Sociallearning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bloom, D. S. (1988). The graphic prewriting representations of selected ninth-grade writers during formal assessment of a writing sample (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 49,10A.
4. Bridgeman, B., &Carson, S. B. (1985). Survey of academic writing tasks.Written Communication, 2,247-280.
5. Brown, A. L., &Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22,1-14.
6. Burning, R. (1987, December).Development of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy for reading and writing: A regression and causal modeling approach.Paper presented at the 37th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
7. Cavenagh, R. W. (1989). Learner information-seeking behavior resulting from two modes of goal-setting interventions derived from NPI theory (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 49,3692A.
8. Educational Testing Service (1985).Guide to the use of the descriptive tests of language skills.Princeton, NJ: The College Board.
9. Flower, L. S., &Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg &E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in xoriting(pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Flower, L. S., &Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing.College Composition and Communication,32,365-387.
11. Fry, E. B. (1972)Reading instruction for classroom and clinic.New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Hayes, J. R., &Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg &E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing, pp. 3-30.
13. Johns, A. M. (1985). Summary protocols of "under prepared" and "adept" university students: Replications and distortions of the original.Language Learning, 35,495-512.
14. Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2),355-365.
15. Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands.American Journal of Psychology, 103(3),327-342.
16. Kintsch, W., &van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review,85(5), 363-394.
17. Leland, C. H. (1986). A training study in metacognitive strategies for expository writing (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University).Dissertation Abstracts International, 47,04A.
18. Lloyd-Jones, R. (1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. R. Cooper &L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing(pp. 33-66). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
19. Marcus, M. (1988).Self-regulation in expository writing.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York.
20. McCarthy, P., Metier, S., &Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation.College Composition and Communication,36(4), 465-471.
21. Nelson, J., &Hayes, J. R. (1988).How the writing context shapes college students' strategies for writing from sources.(Technical Report No. 16). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 297 374)
22. Nichols-Hope, K. T., &Beach, L. R. (1990). The effects of test anxiety and task variables on predecisional information search.Journal of Research in Personality, 24,163-172.
23. Schunk, D. H. (1983a). Developing children's self-efficacy and skills: The roles of social comparative information and goal setting.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8,76-86.
24. Schunk, D. H. (1983b). Progress self-monitoring: Effects on children's self-efficacy and achievement.Journal of Experimental Education, 51,89-93.
25. Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal-setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning disabled children.Journal of Special Education, 19,347-369.
26. Schunk, D. H. (1986). Verbalization and children's self-regulated learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11,347-369.
27. Shanahan, T. (1984). Nature of the reading-writing relation: An exploratory multivariate analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(3), 466-477.
28. Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., &Burning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,81(1), 91-100.
29. Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing.Written Communication,7(2), 256-287.
30. Spivey, N. N., &King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources.Reading Research Quarterly,24(1), 7-26.
31. Zimmerman, B. J. (1993, April).Strategy perceptions and self-efficacy in academic goal attainment.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
32. Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk &B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance(pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Zimmerman, B. J.,&Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies.American Educational Research Journal,23(4), 614-628.
34. Zimmerman, B. J., &Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1), 51-59.