Differential effects of stimulus context in sensory processing

Revue europeenne de psychologie appliquee

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 213-221

  Marks, L E ^a   Arieh, Y ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual effects; Perceptual magnitude; Sensory processes; Stimulus intensity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751119942     PISSN: 11629088     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2005.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arieh Y., Kelly K., and Marks L.E. Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness induction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (2005) 3381-3384
2. Arieh Y., and Marks L.E. Context effects in visual length perception: role of ocular, retinal, and spatial location. Percept. Psychophys. 64 (2002) 478-492
3. Arieh Y., and Marks L.E. Recalibrating the auditory system: a speed-accuracy analysis of intensity perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29 (2003) 523-536
4. Arieh Y., and Marks L.E. Time course of loudness recalibration: implications for loudness enhancement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114 (2003) 1550-1556
5. Armstrong L., and Marks L.E. Stimulus context, perceived length, and the horizontal-vertical illusion. Percept. Psychophys. 59 (1997) 1200-1213
6. Cain W.S., and Gent J.F. Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17 (1991) 382-391
7. Doty R.L., Shaman P., Applebaum S.L., Giberson R., Siksorski L., and Rosenberg L. Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science 226 (1984) 1441-1443
8. Helson H. Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behaviour (1964), Harper and Row, New York
9. Larsson M., Finkeld D., and Pedersen N.L. Odor identification: influences of age, gender, cognition, and personality. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sciences Social Sciences 55 (2000) P304-P310
10. Mapes-Riordan D., and Yost W.A. Loudness recalibration as a function of level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (1999) 3506-3511
11. Marks L.E. Magnitude estimation and sensory matching. Percept. Psychophys. 43 (1988) 511-525
12. Marks L.E. The contingency of perceptual processing: context modifies equal-loudness relations. Psychol. Science 3 (1992) 285-291
13. Marks L.E. The slippery context effect in psychophysics: intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua. Percept. Psychophys. 51 (1992) 187-198
14. Marks L.E. Contextual processing of multidimensional and unidimensional auditory stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19 (1993) 227-249
15. Marks L.E. Differential context effects within but not between modalities?. In: Garriga-Trillo A., Miñón P.R., García-Gallego C., Lubin P., Merino J.M., and Villarino A. (Eds). Fechner Day 93: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (1993), UNED, Palma de Mallorca, Spain 161-166
16. Marks L.E. Recalibrating the auditory system: the perception of loudness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20 (1994) 382-396
17. Marks L.E., and Armstrong L. Haptic and visual representations of space. In: Inui T., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Attention and Performance XVI (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 262-287
18. Marks L.E., Stevens J.C., Bartoshuk L.M., Gent J.F., Rifkin B., and Stone V.K. Magnitude-matching: the measurement of taste and smell. Chem., Senses 13 (1988) 63-87
19. Marks L.E., and Warner E. Slippery context effect and critical bands. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17 (1991) 986-996
20. Nieder B., Buus S., Florentine M., and Scharf B. Interactions between test-and inducer-tone durations in induced loudness reduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114 (2003) 2846-2855
21. Potts, B.C., 1991. The horizontal-vertical illusion: a confluence of configural, contextual, and framing factors. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
22. Prinzmetal W., and Gettleman L. Horizontal-vertical illusion: one eye is better than two. Percept. Psychophys. 53 (1993) 81-88
23. Rankin K.M., and Marks L.E. Differential context effects in taste perception. Chem., Senses 16 (1991) 617-629
24. Rankin K.M., and Marks L.E. Effects of context on sweet and bitter tastes: unrelated to sensitivity to PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil). Percept. Psychophys. 52 (1992) 479-486
25. Rankin K.M., and Marks L.E. Chemosensory context effects: role of perceived similarity and neural commonality. Chem., Senses 25 (2000) 748-759
26. Samuel A.G. Red herring detectors and speech perception: in defence of selective adaptation. Cognitive Psychol. 18 (1986) 452-499
27. Sawush J.R. Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62 (1977) 738-750
28. Scharf B., Buus S., and Nieder B. Loudness enhancement: induced loudness reduction in disguise?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (2002) 807-810
29. Schneider B., and Parker S. Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgment?. Percept. Psychophys. 48 (1990) 409-418
30. Schneider B.A., Parker S., and Moraglia G. The effect of stimulus range on perceived contrast: evidence for contrast gain control. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 50 (1996) 347-355
31. Stevens J.C., and Cain W.S. Age-related deficiency in the strength of six odorants. Chem., Senses 10 (1985) 517-529
32. Wong T. Dynamic properties of radial and tangential movements as determinants of the haptic horizontal-vertical illusion with an L-figure. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 3 (1977) 151-164