Teardowns and land values in the Chicago metropolitan area

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 45-63

  Dye, Richard F ^a   McMillen, Daniel P ^b  

^a LAKE FOREST COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Demolition; Hedonic models; Housing prices; Land values; Misclassification; Redevelopment; Teardowns

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751116278     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bollinger C.R., and David M.H. Estimation with response error and non-response: Food stamp participation in the SIPP. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19 (2001) 129-141
2. J.K. Brueckner, S.S. Rosenthal, Gentrification and neighborhood housing cycles: Will America's future downtowns be rich? Manuscript, Syracuse University, 2005
3. Caudill S.B., and Mixon Jr. F.G. Analysing misleading discrete responses: A logit model based on misclassified data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67 (2005) 105-113
4. Dustman C., and Van Soest A. An analysis of speaking fluency of immigrants using ordered response models with classification errors. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 22 (2004) 312-321
5. Dustman C., and Van Soest A. Language fluency and earnings: Estimation with misclassified language indicators. Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (2001) 663-674
6. Fay S., Hurst E., and White M.J. The household bankruptcy decision. American Economic Review 92 (2002) 706-718
7. Frazis H., and Loewenstein M.A. Estimating linear regressions with mismeasured, possibly endogenous, binary explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics 117 (2003) 151-178
8. Hausman J.A., Arbrevaya J., and Scott-Morton F.M. Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1998) 239-260
9. Heckman J.J. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (1976) 475-492
10. Helms A.C. Understanding gentrification: An empirical analysis of the determinants of urban housing renovation. Journal of Urban Economics 54 (2003) 474-498
11. Kenkel D.S., Lillard D.R., and Mathios A.D. Accounting for misclassification error in retrospective smoking data. Health Economics 13 (2004) 1031-1044
12. Leece D. Household choice of fixed versus floating rate debt: A binomial probit model with correction for classification error. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 62 (2000) 61-82
13. McGrath D.T. Urban industrial redevelopment and contamination risk. Journal of Urban Economics 47 (2000) 414-442
14. McMillen D.P. The return of centralization to Chicago: Using repeat sales to identify changes in house price distance gradients. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33 (2003) 287-304
15. Munneke H.J. Redevelopment decisions for commercial and industrial properties. Journal of Urban Economics 39 (1996) 229-253
16. Nechyba T.J., and Walsh R.P. Urban sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (2004) 177-200
17. Rosenthal S.S., and Helsley R.W. Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient. Journal of Urban Economics 35 (1994) 182-200
18. Sander W. On the demand for city living. Journal of Economic Geography 5 (2005) 351-364
19. W. Sander, The demand for living in Chicago, DePaul University, processed, 2005
20. Vigdor J.L. Does gentrification hurt the poor?. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (2002) 133-173
21. Village of Kenilworth, Demolition Amendment Ordinance (II) (2005). http://www.villageofkenilworth.org
22. Village of Skokie, Comprehensive Plan Appendix C: Near North Suburban Housing Activity Study, 2005. (http://www.skokie.org/comm/Appendix%20C.pdf)
23. R. Weber, M. Doussard, S. Dev Bhatta, D. McGrath, Tearing the city down: Explaining the incidence of privately initiated demolitions, Urban Planning and Policy Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2005
24. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 (1980) 817-838