Effect of visibility on time allocation and escape decisions in crimson rosellas

Australian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 363-367

  Boyer, Jennifer S ^a   Hass, Laura L ^a   Lurie, Matthew H ^a   Blumstein, Daniel T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BIRD; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LOCOMOTION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; TIME ALLOCATION; VISIBILITY;

EID: 33751114969     PISSN: 0004959X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/ZO05080     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arnez, C. L., and Leger, D. W. (1997). Artificial visual obstruction, antipredator vigilance, and predator detection in the thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus). Behaviour 134, 1101-1114.
2. Blumstein, D. T. (2003). Flight initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. Journal of Wildlife Management 67, 852-857.
3. Blumstein, D. T. (2006). Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Animal Behaviour 71, 389-399. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2005.05.010
4. Blumstein, D. T., and Daniel, J. C. (2003). Foraging behavior of three Tasmanian macropodid marsupials in response to present and historical predation threat. Ecography 26, 585-594. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03516.x
5. Blumstein, D. T., Fernandez-Juricic, E., LeDee, O., Larsen, E., Rodriguez-Prieto, I., and Zugmeyer, C. (2004a). Avian risk assessment: effects of perching height and detectability. Ethology 110, 273-285. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00970.x
6. Blumstein, D. T., Runyan, A., Seymour, M., Nicodemus, A., Ozgul, A., Ransler, F., Im, S., Stark, T., Zugmeyer, C., and Daniel, J. C. (2004b). Locomotor ability and wariness in yellow-bellied marmots. Ethology 110, 615-634. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004. 01000.x
7. Blumstein, D. T., Daniel, J. C., and Evans, C. S. (2005a). 'JWatcher 1.0 beta.' Available at http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu [Verified 15 October 2006].
8. Blumstein, D. T., Fernández-Juricic, E., Zollner, P. A., and Garity, S. C. (2005b). Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 943-953. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664. 2005.01071.x
9. Caro, T. (2005). 'Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals.' (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.)
10. Cooper, W. E. (2003). Risk factors affecting escape behavior by the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis: speed and directness of predator approach, degree of cover, direction of turning by a predator, and temperature. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 979-984. doi:10.1139/z03-079
11. Dukas, R., and Kamil, A. C. (2000). The cost of limited attention in blue jays. Behavioral Ecology 11, 502-506. doi:10.1093/beheco/11.5.502
12. Fernández-Juricic, E., Jimenez, M. D., and Lucas, N. (2002). Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert and flight distances in forested habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 1212-1220. doi:10.1139/z02-104
13. Fernández-Juricic, E., Vaca, R., and Schroeder, N. (2004). Spatial and temporal responses of forest birds to human approaches in a protected area and implications for two management strategies. Biological Conservation 117, 407-416. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003. 02.001
14. Finne, M. H., Wegge, P., Eliassen, S., and Odden, M. (2000). Daytime roosting and habitat preference of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus males: the importance of forest structure in relation to anti-predator behaviour. Wildlife Biology 6, 241-249.
15. Lima, S. L. (1992). Vigilance and foraging substrate: anti-predatory considerations in a non-standard environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30, 283-289. doi:10.1007/BF00166714
16. Lima, S. L., and Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619-640.
17. Marten, K., and Marler, P. (1977). Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2, 271-290. doi:10.1007/BF00299740
18. Martin, J., and López, P. (1995). Influence of habitat structure on the escape tactics of the lizard Psammodromus algirus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 129-132.
19. Martin, P., and Bateson, P. (1993). 'Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide.' 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)
20. Metcalfe, N. B. (1984). The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: is visibility important? Animal Behaviour 32, 981-985. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80210-9
21. Olsen, P. (2006). 'A penchant for parrot pie.' NLA News 16. Available at http://www.nla.gov.au/pub/nlanews/2006/jun06/article2.html [Verified 15 October 2006].
22. Rabin, L. A., McCowan, B., Hooper, S. L., and Owings, D. H. (2003). Anthropogenic noise and its effects on animal communication: an interface between comparative psychology and conservation biology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 16, 172-192.
23. Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223-225. doi:10.2307/2409177
24. SPSS (2002). 'SPSS 11 for the Macintosh.' (SPSS: Chicago.)
25. Stankowich, T., and Blumstein, D. T. (2005). Fear in animals: a metaanalysis and review of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 272, 2627-2634.
26. Sun, J. W. C., and Narins, P. M. (2005). Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biological Conservation 121, 419-427. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017
27. Ward, D. H., Stehn, R. A., Erickson, W. P., and Derksen, D. V. (1999). Response of fall-staging Brant and Canada geese to aircraft overflights in southwestern Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 373-381.
28. Whittingham, M. J., and Evans, K. L. (2004). The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 146, 210-220. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00370.x
29. Whittingham, M. J., Butler, S. J., Quinn, J. L., and Creswell, W. (2004). The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines. Oikos 106, 377-385. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004. 13132.x