|
Volumn 42, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 2881-2886
|
Has NICE been nice to cancer?
|
Author keywords
Evidence based medicine; Government; Great Britain; Healthcare economics and organisations; National Health Service; Neoplasms
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
ERLOTINIB;
IRINOTECAN;
OXALIPLATIN;
TRASTUZUMAB;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;
CANCER;
CANCER PATIENT;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
HEALTH CARE ACCESS;
HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM;
HUMAN;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;
RESPONSIBILITY;
UNITED KINGDOM;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
ENGLAND;
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;
HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY;
HUMANS;
NEOPLASMS;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;
WALES;
|
EID: 33751103469
PISSN: 09598049
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (12)
|