A Q-analysis of census data: Intra-household income allocation and school attendance in Chiapas, Mexico

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1061-1077

  Yoshioka, Hirotoshi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Census data; Chiapas; Intra household resource allocation; Q analysis; School attendance; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751098484     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-005-5080-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agarwal, B. (1994). A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Atkin, R. (1977). Combinational Connectivities in Social Systems: An Application of Simplifical Complex Structures to the Study of Large Organizations. Birkhäu, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel and Stuttgart.
3. Atkin, R. (1981). Multidimensional Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
4. Beneria, L. and Roldán, M. (1987). The Crossroads of Class & Gender: Industrial Homework, Subcontracting, and Household Dynamics in Mexico City. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
5. Blackburn, R. S. (1982). Dimensions of Structure: A Review and Reappraisal. Academy of Management Review 7: 59-66.
6. Blau, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York, London and Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. (1999). UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
8. Bourque, S. C. and Warren, K. B. (1981). Women of the Andes: Patriarchy and Social Change in Two Peruvian Towns. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Cruces, J. G. L. and Romero, C. R. (2001). La población de México: Tendencias y Perspectivas Sociodemograficas Hacia el Siglo XXI. México, D.F.: Consejo Nacional de Población.
10. Deere, C. D. and Leon, M. (2001). Empowering Women: Land and Property Rights in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11. Deere, C. D. (1990). Household and Class Relations: Peasants and Landlords in Northern Peru. Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press.
12. Doreian, P. (1982a). Leveling Coalitions as Network Phenomena. Social Network 4: 27-45.
13. Doreian, P. (1982b). On the Delineation of Small Group Structures. 215-230 in Classifying Social Data: New Applications of Analytic Methods for Social Science Research, contributed by Herschel C. Hudson. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Eber, C. E. (1999). Seeking Our Own Food: Indigenous Women's Power and Autonomy in San Pedro Chenalhó, Chiapas (1980-1998). Latin American Perspectives 26: 6-36.
15. Engle, P. L. (1995). Father's Money, Mother's Money, and Parental Commitment: Guatemala and Nicaragua. 155-179 In: R. L. Blumberg, C. A. Rakowski, I. Tinker and M. M. Boulder (eds.), EnGENDERing Wealth and Well-Being. San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press.
16. Fuller, B. J. D. Singer and Keiley, M. (1995). Why Do Daughters Leave School in Southern Africa? Family Economy and Mothers' Commitments. Social Forces 74: 657-680.
17. Gould, P. and Gatrell, A. (1979). A structural analysis of a game: The Liverpool vs Manchester United Cup Final of 1977. Social Network 2: 253-273.
18. Gould, P. (1980). Q-analysis, or a Language of Structure: An Introduction for Social Scientists, Geographers and Planners. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 13: 169-199.
19. Halaby, C. (2003). Where job values come from: Family and schooling background, cognitive ability, and gender. American Sociological Review 68: 251-278.
20. Hamilton, S. (2002). Research reports and notes: Neoliberalism, gender, and property rights in rural mexico. Latin American Research Review 37(1): 119-143.
21. Jacobson, T. L. and Yan, W (1998). Q-analysis techniques for studying communication content. Quality & Quantity 32: 93-108.
22. Jacobson, T. (2003). Visualizing Information Seeking with Q-analysis. Paper presented at a non-divisional workshop held at the meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
23. Legrand, J. (2002). How far can Q-analysis go into social system understanding? Fifth European Systems Science Congress. Crete, Res-Systematica http://www.afscet.asso.fr/resSystemica/Crete02/Legrand.pdf.
24. Lustig, N. (1996). The 1982 debt crisis, Chiapas, NAFTA, and Mexico's poor. In: L. Randall and Armonk (eds.), Changing Structure of Mexico: Political, Social, and Economic Prospects. New York and London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., pp. 157-165.
25. Luzuriaga C. C. (1982). Situación de la mujer en el Ecuador. Quito: Maurilia Mendoza.
26. Parker, S. W and Pederzini, C. (2001). Gender differences in education in Mexico. In: G. K. Elizabeth and M. C. Correia (eds.), The Economics of Gender in Mexico: Work, Family, State, and Market. Washington D.C.: World Bank, pp. 9-45.
27. Post, D. (2001). Children's Work, Schooling, and Welfare in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
28. Quisumbing, A. R. and Maluccio, J. A. (2000). Intrahousehold Allocation and Gender Relations: New Empirical Evidence from Four Developing Countries. International Food Policy Research Institute, FCND Discussion Paper #84, Washington, D.C.
29. Sobek, M. Ruggles, S. and McCaa, R. et al. (2004). Integrated Public. Use Microdata Series-International: Preliminary Version 1.0. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, http://www.ipums.org/international.
30. Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach. The Journal of Human Resources. XXV: 635-664.
31. World Bank. (2004). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org/data/wdi2004/index.htm.