How effective is systematic feedback of treatment progress to the therapist? An empirical study in a cognitive-behavioural-orieted impatient setting;Wie effektiv sind systematische rückmeldungen des therapieverlaufs an den therapeuten? Eine empirische studie in einem stationär- verhaltenstherapeutischen setting

Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 21-29

  Berking, Matthias ^a   Orth, Ulrich ^a   Lutz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Feedback; Patient focused research; Psychotherapy; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33751086526     PISSN: 16163443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/1616-3443.35.1.21     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., Benson, L., Connell, J., Audin, K. & McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes bench-marking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184-196.
2. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years later. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77-100.
4. Breslin, F., Sobell, L. C., Buchan, G. & Cunningham, J. (1997). Toward a stepped-care approach to treating problem drinkers: The predictive validity of within-treatment variables and therapist prognostic ratings. Addiction, 92, 1479-1489.
5. CIPS (Hrsg.). (1996). Internationale Skalen für Psychiatrie. 4. uberarb. u. erw. Aufl. Göttingen: Beltz.
6. Clarkin, J. F. & Levi, K. N. (2004). The influence of client variables on psychotherapy. In J. M. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th edition) (pp. 194-227). New York: Wiley.
7. Derogatis, C. R. (1977). SCL-90, Administration, scoring, and procedures. Manual 1 for the r(evised) version and other instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series. Baltimore: John Hopkins University School of Medicine.
8. Dilling, H., Mombour, W. & Schmidt, M. H. (Hrsg.). (2004). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V (F). Klinisch-Diagnostische Leitlinien, WHO (5 ed.). Bern: Huber.
9. Franke, G. (1995). SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis - Deutsche Version. Weinheim: Beltz.
10. Franke, G. (2000). BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory - Deutsche Version. Manual. Göttingen: Beltz.
11. Goss, S. & Anthony, K. (Eds.). (2003). Technology in counselling and psychotherapy: A practicioner's guide. Palgrave: McMillan.
12. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
13. Grissom, G. R., Lyons, J. S. & Lutz, W. (2002). Standing on the shoulders of a giant: Development of an outcome management system based on the dose model and phase model of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 397-412.
14. Grosse Holtforth, M., Grawe, K. & Tamcan, Ö. (2004). Inkongruenzfragebogen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
15. Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H. & Keller, F. (1994). Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI). Bern: Huber.
16. Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L. & Tuttle, K. C. (2004). The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 308-327.
17. Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G. & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
18. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B. & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventor Interpersonaler Probleme: Manual. Weinheim: Beltz.
19. Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S. & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41, 159-164.
20. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Jacobi, C. (2005). Klinikprofil & Therapiekonzept der Paracelsus Roswitha Klinik Bad Gandersheim (on-line). Verfügbar unter: http://www.paracelsus-kliniken.de/roswitha-klinik/ (1.3.2005).
22. Kluger, A. N. & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
23. Kordy, H., Hannover, W. & Richard, M. (2001). Computer-assisted feedback-driven quality management for psychotherapy: The Stuttgart-Heidelberg Model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 173-183.
24. Lambert, J. M. & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In J. M. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfields Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.) (pp. 139-193). New York: Wiley.
25. Lambert, J. M., Harmon, C., Slade, K., Whipple, J. L. & Hawkins, E. J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients' progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 165-174.
26. Lambert, J. M., Jason, L., Whipple, J. L., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Hawkins, E. J., Nielsen, S. L. & Goates, M. (2002). Enhancing psychotherapy outcome via providing feedback on client progress: A replication. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 91-103.
27. Lambert, J. M., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L. & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49-68.
28. Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C. & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, 249-258.
29. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L. & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 288-301.
30. Lutz, W. (2002). Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment progress as scientific groundwork for an empirical based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 251-272.
31. Lutz, W. (2003). Efficacy, effectiveness, and expected treatment progress in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 745-750.
32. Lutz, W., Tholen, S. & Kosfelder, J. (2004). Modelle und Konzepte zur Entwicklung von Regeln zur empirischen Unterstützung und Evaluation des Psychotherapiebedarfs und der Therapieverlängerung am individuellen Patienten. Verhaltenstherapie und Verhaltensmedizin, 25, 503-527.
33. Lutz, W., Tholen, S., Schürch, E. & Berking, M. (2006). Die Entwicklung, Validität und Reliabilität von Kurzformen gängiger psychometrischer Instrumente zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Fortschrittes in Psychotherapie und Psychiatrie. Diagnostica, 52, 11-25.
34. Margraf, J. (2000). (Hrsg.). Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie. Göttingen, Hogrefe.
35. McCarthy, W. C. & Frieze, I. H. (1999). Negative aspects of psychotherapy: Client perceptions of therapists' social influence, burnout, and quality of care. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 33-50.
36. Meyer, F. & Schulte, D. (2002). Zur Validität der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs durch Therapeuten. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 53-61.
37. Percevic, R., Lambert, M. & Kordy, H. (2004). Computer-supported monitoring of patient treatment response. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 285-299.
38. Riemer, M., Rosof-Williams, J. & Bickman, L. (in press). Theories related to changing clinician practice. In B. J. Burns & K. Hoagwood, Child adolescent psychiatric clinics of North Amerika, evidence-based practice, part II. Philadelphia: Elsevier.
39. Sapyta, J., Riemer, M. & Bickman, L. (2004). Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 145-153.
40. Schepank, H. (1995). Der Beeinträchtigungs-Schwere-Score (BSS). Weinheim: Beltz.
41. Ullrich de Muynck, R. & Ullrich, R. (1977). Der Unsicherheitsfragebogen. München: Pfeiffer.
42. Weinfurt, K. P. (2000). Repeated measures analyses: ANOVA, MANOVA, and HLM. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and unterstanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 317-361). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Whampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K. & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, "all must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.
44. Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L. & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment failure and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 59-68.
45. Zielke, M. & Kopf-Mehnert, C. (1978). Veränderungsfragebogen des Erlebens und Verhaltens (VEV). Weinheim: Beltz.