Do themes in consumer medicines information literature reviews reflect those important to stakeholders?

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 64, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 112-118

  Nicolson, Donald J ^a   Knapp, Peter ^a   Raynor, D K ^a   Grime, Janet ^b   Pollock, Kristian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Medicines information; Patient centred; Stakeholder

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DRUG INFORMATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AGED; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; DRUG INFORMATION SERVICES; DRUG THERAPY; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT EDUCATION; REVIEW LITERATURE; SEMANTICS; TEACHING MATERIALS;

EID: 33751078041     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Raynor D.K. Protocol for a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on the role and effectiveness of written information available to patients about individual medicines. Health Technol Assess (2004). http://www.ncchta.org/project.asp?PjtId=1404
2. Raynor D.K., Savage I., Knapp P., and Henley J. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient Educ Couns 53 (2004) 167-174
3. Nair K., Dolovich L., Cassels A., McCormack J., Levine M., Gray J., et al. What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Phys 48 (2002) 104-110
4. Arthur V. Written patient information: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 21 (1995) 1081-1086
5. Buck M. Providing patients with written medication information. Ann Pharmacother 32 (1998) 962-969
6. Kenny T., Wilson R., Purves I., Clark J.S., Newton L., Newton D., et al. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract 15 (1998) 471-479
7. Koo M., Krass I., and Aslani P. Factors influencing consumer use of written drug information. Ann Pharmacother 32 (2003) 259-267
8. Morris L., and Halperin J. Effects of written drug information on patient knowledge and compliance: a literature review. Am J Public Health 69 (1979) 47-52
9. Haynes R.B., McDonald H., Garg A.X., and Montague P. Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 (2002) CD000011
10. Roter D.L., Hall J.A., Merisca R., Nordstrom B., Cretin D., and Svarstad B. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med Care 36 (1998) 1138-1161
11. Dickinson D., and Raynor D. Ask the patients-they may want to know more than you think. Brit Med J 327 (2003) 861-864
12. Tallon D., Chard J., and Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 355 (2000) 2037-2040
13. Dixon-Woods M. Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets. Soc Sci Med 52 (2001) 1417-1432
14. Grime G., and Pollock K. Information versus experience: a comparison of an information leaflet on antidepressants with lay experience of treatment. Patient Educ Counsel 54 (2004) 361-368
15. Waters E., and Doyle J. Evidence-based public health practice: improving the quality and quantity of the evidence. J Public Health Med 24 (2002) 227-229
16. Entwistle V., Renfrew M.J., Yearley S., Forrester J., and Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. Brit Med J 316 (1998) 463-466