Growing-season stemflow production within a deciduous forest of southern Ontario

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 3651-3663

  Carlyle Moses, D E ^a   Price, A G ^b  

^a THOMPSON RIVERS UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acer saccharum; Fagus grandifolia; Forest hydrology; Funnelling ratio; Quercus rubra; Stemflow

Indexed keywords

GROWTH KINETICS; HARDWOODS; HYDROLOGY; RAIN;

FUNNELING RATIO; STEMFLOW PRODUCTION;

FORESTRY;

FORESTRY; GROWTH KINETICS; HARDWOODS; HYDROLOGY; RAIN;

FORESTRY; HYDROLOGY; RAINFALL; STEMFLOW; TREE;

ACER SACCHARUM; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA; FORESTRY; GROWING SEASON; HYDROLOGY; QUERCUS RUBRA; RAIN; STEMS; TREES;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO;

ACER; ACER SACCHARUM; FAGUS; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA; QUERCUS RUBRA;

EID: 33751071056     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6380     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aboal JR, Morales D, Hernandez M, Jiménez MS. 1999. The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Journal of Hydrology 221: 161-175.
2. Agriculture Canada. 1987. 'The Canadian System of Soil Classification, 2nd edn. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada: Ottawa; Publication 1646.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. 1996a. Transformations, means, and confidence intervals. British Medical Journal 312: 1079.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. 1996b. Statistical notes: The use of transformations when comparing two means. British Medical Journal 312: 1153.
5. Brakensiek DL, Osborn HB, Rawls WJ (eds). 1979. Field Manual for Research in Agricultural Hydrology Science and Education Administration. US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC.
6. Brown JH Jr, Barker AC Jr. 1970. An analysis of throughfall and stemflow in mixed oak stands. Water Resources Research 6: 316-323.
7. Carlyle-Moses DE. 2004. Throughfall, stemflow, and canopy interception loss fluxes in a semi-arid Sierra Madre Oriental matorral community. Journal of Arid Environments 58: 181-202.
8. Carlyle-Moses DE, Price AG. 1999. An evaluation of the Gash interception model in a northern hardwood stand. Journal of Hydrology 214: 103-110.
9. Chang S-C, Matzner E. 2000. The effect of beech stemflow on spatial patterns of soil solution chemistry and seepage fluxes in a mixed beech/ oak stand. Hydrological Processes 14: 135-144.
10. Chapman LJ, Putnam DV. 1966. The Physiology of Southern Ontario. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.
11. Crabtree AF, Trudgill ST. 1985. Hillslope hydrochemistry and stream response on a wooded, permeable bedrock: the role of stemflow. Journal of Hydrology 80: 161-178.
12. Crockford RH, Richardson DP. 1990. Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and pine plantation in southeastern Australia: II. Stemflow and factors affecting stemflow in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest and a Pinus radiata plantation. Hydrological Processes 4: 145-155.
13. Crockford RH, Richardson DP. 2000. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes 14: 2903-2920.
14. Delfs J. 1967. Interception and stemflow in stands of Norway spruce and beech in West Germany. In Forest Hydrology, Sopper WE, Lull HW (eds). Pergamon Press: Oxford, 179-185.
15. Durocher MG. 1990. Monitoring spatial variability of forest interception. Hydrological Processes 4: 215-229.
16. Farmer AM, Bates JW, Bell JNB. 1991. Seasonal varations in acidic pollutant inputs and their effects on the chemistry of stemflow, bark and epiphyte tissues in three oak woodlands in N.W. Britain. New Phytologist 118: 441-451.
17. Giacomin A, Trucchi P. 1992. Rainfall interception in a beech coppice (Aquerino, Italy). Journal of Hydrology 137: 141-147.
18. Goodall D. 1965. Plot-less tests of interspecific associations. Journal of Ecology 53: 197-210.
19. Hanchi A, Rapp M. 1997. Stemflow determination in forest stands. Forest Ecology and Management 97: 231-235.
20. Helvey JD, Patric JH. 1965. Canopy and litter interception of rainfall by hardwoods of the eastern United States. Water Resource Research 1: 193-206.
21. Herwitz SR. 1985. Interception storage capacities of tropical rainforest canopy trees. Journal of Hydrology 77: 237-252.
22. Herwitz SR. 1986. Infiltration-excess caused by stemflow in a cyclone-prone tropical rainforest. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 11: 401-412.
23. Herwitz SR. 1987. Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 12: 425-432.
24. Herwitz SR, Levia DF Jr. 1997. Mid-winter stemflow drainage from bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata Michx.) in central Massachusetts. Hydrological Processes 11: 169-175.
25. Herwitz SR, Slye RE. 1995. Three dimensional modeling of canopy tree interception of wind driven rainfall. Journal of Hydrology 168: 205-226.
26. Horton RE. 1919. Rainfall interception. Monthly Weather Review 47: 603-623.
27. Hutchinson I, Roberts MC. 1981. Vertical variation in stemflow generation. Journal of Applied Ecology 18: 521-527.
28. Kolka RK, Nater EA, Grigal DF, Verry S. 1999. Atmospheric inputs of mercury and organic carbon into a forested upland/bog watershed. Water Air And Soil Pollution 113: 273-294.
29. Leonard RE. 1961. Net Precipitation in a northern hardwood forest. Journal of Geophysical Research 66: 2417-2421.
30. Levia DF Jr. 2004. Differential winter stemflow generation under contrasting storm conditions in a southern New England broad-leaved deciduous forest. Hydrological Processes 18: 1105-1112.
31. Levia DF Jr, Frost EE. 2003. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural systems. Journal of Hydrology 274: 1-29.
32. Liu S. 1998. Estimation of rainfall storage capacity in the canopies of cypress wetlands and slash pine uplands in North-Central Florida. Journal of Hydrology 207: 32-41.
33. Loustau D, Berbigier P, Granier A, El Hadj Moussa F. 1992. Interception loss, throughfall and stemflow in a maritime pine stand I. Variability of throughfall and stemflow beneath the pine canopy. Journal of Hydrology 138: 449-467.
34. Mahendrappa MK. 1990. Partitioning of rainwater and chemicals into throughfall and stemflow in different forest stands. Forest Ecology and Management 30: 65-72.
35. Martinez-Meza E, Whitford WG. 1996. Stemflow, throughfall and channelization of stemflow by roots in three Chihuahuan desert shrubs. Journal of Arid Environments 32: 271-287.
36. Návar J. 1993. The causes of stemflow variation in three semi-arid growing species of northeastern Mexico. Journal of Hydrology 145: 175-190.
37. Ovington JD. 1954. A comparison of rainfall in different woodlands. Forestry 27: 41-53.
38. Parker GG. 1983. Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Advances in Ecological Research 13: 57-133.
39. Price AG, Carlyle-Moses DE. 2003. Measurement and modelling of growing-season canopy water fluxes in a mature mixed deciduous forest stand, southern Ontario, Canada. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 119: 69-85.
40. Price AG, Watters RJ, 1989. The influence of overstory, understory and upper soil horizons on the fluxes of some ions in a mixed deciduous forest. Journal of Hydrology 109: 185-197.
41. Price AG, Dunham K, Carleton T, Band L. 1997. Variability of water fluxes through the black spruce (Picea mariana) canopy and feather moss (Pleurozium schreberi) carpet in the boreal forest of Northern Manitoba. Journal of Hydrology 196: 310-323.
42. Skrivan P, Rusek J, Fottová D, Burian M, Minaøík L. 1985. Factors affecting the content of heavy metals in bulk atmospheric precipitation, throughfall and stemflow in central Bohemia, Czech Republic. Water Air And Soil Pollution 85: 841-846.
43. Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M, Tanka T. 1996. Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge. 1: evaluation of the stemflow contribution to recharge using a mass balance approach. Hydrological Processes 10: 81-88.
44. Turner K 1975. Groundwater resistivity of Ernidale college, B.A. thesis (Advisor P. Duckworth), Department of Geography, University of Toronto at Mississauga.
45. Government of Canada and The United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. The Great Lakes: An Environmental and Resources Book. Third Edition. Government of Canada (Toronto) and USEPA (Chicago).
46. Voigt GK. 1960. Distribution of rainfall under forest stands. Forest Science 6: 2-10.
47. Voigt GK, Zwolinski MJ. 1964. Absorption of stemflow by bark of young red and white pines. Forest Science 10: 277-282.