Measurement and detection of spiculated lesions

Proceedings of the IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 105-109

  Sampat, Mehul P ^a   Markey, Mia K ^a   Bovik, Alan C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION (CAD); DETECTION ALGORITHM; MEASURING PROPERTIES; SPICULATED LESIONS;

ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LOCATION; TUMORS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 33751066414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Cancer Facts and Figures 2005. 2005, American Cancer Society: Atlanta.
2. American College of Radiology, ACR BIRADS - Mammography, Ultrasound & Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Fourth ed. 2003, Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.
3. Liberman, L., et al., The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology., 1998. 171(1): p. 35-40.
4. Baker, J.A., et al., Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology., 2003. 181(4): p. 1083-8.
5. Orel, S.G., et al., BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology., 1999. 211(3): p. 845-50.
6. Bird, R.E., T.W. Wallace, and B.C. Yankaskas, Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology., 1992. 184(3): p. 613-7.
7. Burrell, H., et al., False-negative breast screening assessment. What lessons can we learn? Clinical Radiology, 2001. 56(5): p. 385-388.
8. Burrell, H., D. Sibbering, and A. Wilson, Screening interval breast cancers: Mammographic features of prognostic factors. Radiology, 1996. 199: p. 811-817.
9. Sampat, M.P., M.K. Markey, and A.C. Bovik, Computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography, in Handbook of Image and Video Processing, A.C. Bovik, Editor. 2005, Academic Press, p. 1195-1217.
10. US Food and Drug Administration, Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: R2 Technologies. P970058, 1998.
11. Freer, T.W. and M.J. Ulissey, Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology., 2001. 220(3): p. 781-6.
12. Sampat, M.P. and A. Bovik, Detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. The 25th annual international Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003.
13. Sampat, M.P., et al., Evidence-based detection of spiculated masses and architectural distortions. Medical Imaging 2005: Image Processing, 2005. 5747: p. 26-37.
14. Tourassi, G.D. and C.E. Floyd, Jr., Performance evaluation of an informationtheoretic CAD scheme for the detection of mammographie architectural distortion. 2004.
15. Ayres, F.J. and R.M. Rangayvan, Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 2005. 24(1): p. 59-67.
16. Tourassi, G.D., et al. Detection of architectural distortions in mammograms using fractal analysis, in SPIE Medical Imaging. 2005. San Diego
17. Ichikawa, T., et al. Automated detection method for architectural distortions areas on mammograms based on morphological processing and surface analysis, in SPIE Medical Imaging. 2004. San Diego.
18. Dice, L.R., Measures of the amount of ecologie association between species. Ecology, 1945. 26: p. 297-302.
19. Jaccard, P., The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. New Phytologis, 1912. 11: p. 37-50.
20. Prieto, M. and A. A., A similarity metric for edge images. IEEE Trans, on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2003. 25.
21. Wang, Z. and E. Simoncell. Translation insensitive image similarity metric in complex wavelet domain in Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2005.
22. McGraw, K.O. and S.P. Wong, Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1996. 1(1): p. 30-46.
23. Rosner, B., Fundamentals ofBiostatistics. 6th ed. 2005: Duxbury Press.
24. Heath, M., et al. The Digital Database for Screening Mammography. in 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. 2000. Toronto, Canada.