Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 196, Issue 4-6, 2007, Pages 879-893

  Goel, Tushar ^a   Vaidyanathan, Rajkumar ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^a   Shyy, Wei ^a   Queipo, Nestor V ^b   Tucker, Kevin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA   (Venezuela)

^c NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Multi objective evolutionary algorithms; Pareto drift; Pareto optimal front; Response surface approximation; Rocket injector design

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MACHINE DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE;

MULTI-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; PARETO DRIFT; PARETO OPTIMAL FRONT; RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATION; ROCKET INJECTOR DESIGN;

ROCKETS;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MACHINE DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; ROCKETS;

EID: 33751064642     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Miettinen K.M. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization (1999), Kluwer, Boston
2. Messac A. Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J. 34 1 (1996) 149-158
3. Sen P., and Yang J.-B. Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design (1998), Springer-Verlag, London
4. Chankong V., and Haimes Y.Y. Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology (1983), Elsevier Science, New York
5. Deb K. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms (2001), Wiley, Chichester, UK
6. E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, An evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization: The strength Pareto approach, Technical report no. 43, Zurich: Computer engineering and networks laboratory Switzerland, 1998.
7. Knowles J., and Corne D. Approximating the non-dominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evol. Comput. 8 2 (2000) 149-172
8. K. Deb, S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II, in: Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, Paris, 2000, pp. 849-858.
9. K. Deb, T. Goel, Controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms for better convergence, in: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, Zurich, 2001, pp. 67-81.
10. D. Sasaki, M. Morikawa, S. Obayashi, K. Nakahashi, Aerodynamic shape optimization of supersonic wings by adaptive range multi-objective genetic algorithms, in: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, Zurich, 2001, pp. 639-652.
11. Sasaki D., Obayashi S., and Nakahashi K. Navier-Stokes optimization of supersonic wings with four objectives using evolutionary algorithms. J. Aircraft 39 4 (2002) 621-629
12. Mäkinen R.A.E., Periaux J., and Toivanen J. Multidisciplinary shape optimization in aerodynamics and electromagnetics using genetic algorithms. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 30 (1999) 149-159
13. Deb K., and Goel T. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for engineering shape design. In: Sarker R., Mohammadin M., and Yao X. (Eds). Evolutionary Optimization (2000), Kluwer 147-176
14. K. Deb, T. Goel, A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary approach to engineering shape design, in: Proceedings of Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization Conference, Zurich, 2001, pp. 385-399.
15. T. Goel, K. Deb, Hybrid methods for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, in: Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning Computational Intelligence for the e-age SEAL'02, Singapore, 2002, pp. 188-192.
16. Ishibuchi H., Yoshida T., and Murata T. Balance between genetic search and local search in memetic algorithms for multi-objective permutation flowshop scheduling. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7 2 (2003) 204-223
17. Obayashi S., Sasaki D., and Oyama A. Finding tradeoffs by using multi-objective optimization algorithms. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 47 155 (2004) 51-58
18. Madsen J.I., Shyy W., and Haftka R.T. Response surface techniques for diffuser shape optimization. AIAA J. 38 (2000) 1512-1518
19. R. Vaidyanathan, N. Papila, W. Shyy, K.P. Tucker, L.W. Griffin, R.T. Haftka, N. Fitz-Coy, Neural network and response surface methodology for rocket engine component optimization, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Paper No. 2000-4480, Long Beach, CA, 2000.
20. Vaidyanathan R., Tucker K.P., Papila N., and Shyy W. CFD based design optimization for a single element rocket injector. J. Propulsion Power 20 4 (2004) 705-717 (also presented in 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2003)
21. Shyy W., Papila N., Vaidyanathan R., and Tucker K. Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components. Progr. Aerospace Sci. 37 (2001) 59-118
22. N. Papila, W. Shyy, L.W. Griffin, F. Huber, K. Tran, Preliminary design optimization for a supersonic turbine for rocket propulsion, in: 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Huntsville, AL, 2000.
23. Papila N., Shyy W., Griffin L.W., and Dorney D.J. Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using response surface and neural network methods. J. Propulsion Power 18 (2001) 509-518
24. R. Dornberger, D. Büche, P. Stoll, Multidisciplinary optimization in turbomachinery design, in: European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Barcelona, 2000.
25. Bramanti A., Di Barba P., Farina M.B., and Savini A. Combining response surfaces and evolutionary strategies for multi-objective Pareto-optimization in electromagnetics. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 15 (2001) 231-236
26. Wilson B., Cappelleri D., Simpson T.W., and Frecker M. Efficient Pareto frontier exploration using surrogate approximations. Optim. Engrg. 2 (2001) 31-50
27. Cappelleri D.J., Frecker M.I., Simpson T.W., and Snyder A. A metamodel based approach for optimal design of a PZT bimorph actuator for minimally invasive surgery. ASME J. Mech. Des. 124 2 (2002) 354-357
28. Farina M., and Sykulski J.K. Comparative study of evolution strategies combined with approximation techniques for practical electromagnetic optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Magn. 37 5 (2001) 3216-3220
29. Farina M., Di Barba P., and Bramanti A. A GRS method for Pareto-optimal front identification in electromagnetic multi-objective synthesis. IEEE Proc. Sci. Manage. Technol. 149 5 (2002) 207-213
30. Emmerich M., Giotis A., Ozdenir M., Baeck T., and Giannakoglou K. Metamodel-assisted evolution strategies. Proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VII) (2002), Springer LNCS 361-370
31. Emmerich M., Giannakoglou K., and Naujoks B. Single and multi-objective optimization assisted by Gaussian random field metamodels. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. (Special Issue on Evolutionary Computation in the Presence of Uncertainty) 10 4 (2006) 421-439
32. Ong Y.S., Nair P.B., and Keane A.J. Evolutionary optimization of computationally expensive problems via surrogate modeling. AIAA J. 41 4 (2003) 687-696
33. P.K.S. Nain, K. Deb, A multi-objective optimization procedure with successive approximation methods, KANGAL Technical Report 2005002, Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, India, 2005.
34. J. Knowles, E.J. Hughes, Multiobjective optimization on a budget of 250 evaluations, in: Proceedings of Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization Conference, 2005, LNCS 3410, pp. 176-190.
35. Knowles J. ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multi-objective optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10 1 (2006) 50-66
36. Y.S. Chen, Compressible and incompressible flow computation with a pressure-based method, AIAA89-0286, in: AIAA 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1989.
37. T.S. Wang, Y.S. Chen, A united Navier-Stokes flowfield and performance analysis of liquid rocket engines, AIAA 90-2494, in: AIAA 26th Joint Propulsion Conference, 1990.
38. Y.S. Chen, R.C. Farmer, CFD analysis of baffle flame stabilization, AIAA 91-1967, in: AIAA 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, 1991.
39. Myers R.H., and Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology - Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiment (1995), Wiley-Interscience
40. Steuer R.E. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application (1986), Wiley, New York
41. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1989), Addison-Wesley
42. T. Goel, R. Vaidyanathan, R.T. Haftka, N.V. Queipo, W. Shyy, K. Tucker, Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization, in: Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, 2004, AIAA2004-4501.
43. ®, The language of technical computing, Version 6.5 Release 13. © 1984-2002, The MathWorks, Inc.
44. P. Ramu, S. Missoum, R.T. Haftka, A convex hull approach for the reliability-based optimization of transient dynamic problems, in: Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, 2004, AIAA 2004-4618.
45. Jain A.K., and Dubes R.C. Algorithms for Clustering Data (1988), Prentice Hall College, New Jersey
46. Owen A. Orthogonal arrays for: computer experiments, integration and visualization. Statist. Sin. 2 2 (1992) 439-452
47. ®, The statistical discovery software™, Version 5, Copyright © 1989-2002, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
48. Y. Mack, T. Goel, W. Shyy, R.T. Haftka, Surrogate model based optimization framework: a case study in aerospace design, in: S. Yang, Y.S. Ong, Y. Jin (Eds.), Evolutionary Computation in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments, accepted for publication.
49. R. Vaidyanathan, T. Goel, W. Shyy, R.T. Haftka, N.V. Queipo, K. Tucker, Global sensitivity and trade-off analyses for multi-objective liquid rocket injector design, in: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 2004.