The "Hawthorne effect" is a myth, but what keeps the story going?

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 402-412

  Kompier, Michiel A J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Hawthorne studies; Human Relations School

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HAWTHORNE EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LAZINESS; LITERATURE; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGIST; RESEARCH; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STATUS;

EID: 33751062249     PISSN: 03553140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1036     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adair JG. The Hawthorne effect: a reconsideration of the methodological artifact. J Appl Psychol. 1984;78:413-32.
2. Ruch F, Zimbardo P. Psychology and life. 8th edition. Glenview (IL): Scott Foresman; 1971.
3. Wickstrom MD, Bendix T. The "Hawthorne effect" - what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000;26(4):363-7.
4. Mayo E. The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York (NY): MacMillan; 1933.
5. Whitehead TN. The industrial worker: a statistical study of human relations in a group of manual workers. 2 volumes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1938.
6. Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ. Management and the worker. Cambridge (UK); London: Harvard University Press; 1939.
7. Roethlisberger FJ. Management and morale. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1941.
8. Mayo E. The social problems of an industrial civilization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (reprinted in 1975, with a foreword by JH Smith); 1949.
9. French J. Experiments in field settings. In: Festinger L, Katz D, editors. Research methods in behavioral sciences. New York (NY): Holt, Rinehart and Wilson; 1953. p 98-135.
10. Bramel D, Friend R. Hawthorne, the myth of the docile worker, and class bias in psychology. Am Psychol. 1981;36(8): 867-78.
11. Olson R, Verley J, Santos L, Salas C. What we teach students about the Hawthorne Studies: a review of content within a sample of introductory I-O and OB textbooks. Ind Org Psychol. 2004;41(3):23-39.
12. Gale EAM. The Hawthorne studies - a fable for our times? QJM. 2004;97:439-49.
13. Snow CE. Research on industrial illumination: a discussion of the relation of illumination intensity to productive efficiency. The Tech Engineering News. 1927: 257, 272, 274, 282.
14. Parsons HM. What happened at Hawthorne? Science. 1974:183;922-32.
15. Mulherin J. The sociology of work and organizations: historical context and pattern of development [dissertation]. Berkeley (CA): University of California; 1980.
16. Greenwood RG, Bolton AA, Greenwood BA. Hawthorne a half century later: relay assembly participants remember. J Manage 1983;9(2):217-31.
17. Kompier MAJ, Cooper CL, Geurts SAE. A multiple case study approach to work stress prevention in Europe. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2000;9(3):371-400.
18. Yorks L, Whitsett DA. Hawthorne, Topeka, and the issue of science versus advocacy in organizational behaviour. Acad Manage Rev. 1985;120:21-30.
19. Jones SRG. Was there a Hawthorne effect? Am J Sociol. 1992;98(3):451-68.
20. Parsons HM. What caused the Hawthorne effect? A scientific detective story. Adm Soc. 1978;10:259-83.
21. Franke RH, Kaul JD. The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. Am Sociol Rev. 1978;43:623-43.
22. Franke RH. The Hawthorne experiments: re-view. Am Sociol Rev. 1979;44:861-7.
23. Bramel D, Friend R. Is industrial psychology none of Marxism's business? Am Psychol. 1982;37:860-2.
24. Locke EA. Critique of Bramel and Friend. Am Psychol. 1982;37:858-9.
25. Stagner R. The importance of historical context. Am Psychol. 1982;37:856.
26. Feldman J. Ideology without data. Am Psychol. 1982;37:857-8.
27. Vogel W. A Judeo-Christian rejoinder to Bramel and Friend's Marxist critique of the capitalist Hawthorne effect. Am Psychol. 1982;37:859-60.
28. Bourke H. Industrial unrest as social pathology: the Australian writings of Elton Mayo. Hist Stud. 1982;20:217-33.
29. Golden CS, Ruttenberg HZ. Dynamics of industrial democracy. New York (NY): Harper; 1942.
30. Argyle M. The relay assembly test room in retrospective. Occup Psychol. 1953;27:98-103.
31. Carey A. The Hawthorne studies: a radical criticism. Am Sociol Rev. 1967;32:403-16.
32. Wardwell WI. Critique of a recent professional 'Put-Down' of the Hawthorne research. Am Sociol Rev. 1979;44:858-61.
33. Rice B. The Hawthorne defect: persistence of a flawed theory. Psychol Today. 1982;16:70-4.
34. Gillespie, R. Manufacturing knowledge. a history of the Hawthorne experiments. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1991.
35. Smith JH. Foreword. In: Mayo E. The social problems of an industrial civilization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1949, reprinted in 1975.
36. Kompier M. Job design and well-being. In: Schabracq M, Winnubst J, Cooper C, editors. Handbook work and health psychology. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2003:429-54.
37. Zickar MJ. An analysis of industrial-organizational psychology's indifference to labor unions in the United States. Hum Relat 2004;57:145-67.
38. Taylor FW. The principles of scientific management. New York (NY): Harper Brothers; 1911.