Cervical laminoplasty - Review of surgical techniques, indications, methods of efficacy evaluation, and complications;Laminoplastyki szyjne - Przeglad technik operacyjnych, wskazania, metody oceny skuteczności i powikłania

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 422-432

  Derenda, Marek ^a   Kowalina, Ireneusz ^a  

^a Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony ^*  (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERVICAL SPINE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; NECK MALFORMATION; NECK PAIN; NERVE ROOT INJURY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; NERVE COMPRESSION SYNDROMES; OSSIFICATION OF POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT; PROGNOSIS; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL NERVE ROOTS; SPINAL OSTEOPHYTOSIS;

EID: 33751060651     PISSN: 00283843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Ratliff J.K., Cooper P.R. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 2003; 98: 230-238.
2. Shaffrey C., Wiggins G.C., Piccirilli C.B. i wsp. Modified open-door laminoplasty for treatment of neurological deficits in younger patients with congenital spinal stenosis: analysis of clinical and radiographic data. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 1999; 90: 170-177.
3. Oyama M., Hattori S., Moriwaki N. A new method of cervical laminoplasty, Cent Jpn J Onhoo Trauma Surg 1973; 16: 792-794.
4. Kirita Y, Miyazaki K., Hayashi T. i wsp. Posterior decompression for spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Shujutu 1976; 30: 287-302.
5. Hirabayashi K., Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 1988; 13: 870-876.
6. Hirabayashi K., Watanabe K., Wakano K. i wsp. Expansive open-door larninoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983; 8: 693-699.
7. Hirabayashi K. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Jpn J Surg 1978; 32: 1159-1163.
8. O'Brien M., Peterson D., Casey A.T.H. i wsp. A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization. A computerized morphometric analysis. Spine 1996; 21: 474-484.
9. Iwasaki M., Ebara S., Miyamoto S. i wsp. Expansive laminoplasty for cervical radiculomyelopathy due to soft disc herniation. Spine 1996; 21: 32-38.
10. Baba H., Chen Q., Uchida K. i wsp. Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: a preliminary report. Spine 1996; 21: 196-202.
11. Baba H., Furusawa N., Chen Q. i wsp. Cervical laminoplasty in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 25-29.
12. Roselli R., Pompucci A., Fomica F. i wsp. Open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: surgical technique and neurophysiological monitoring. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2000; 92: 38-43.
13. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N., Tanaka H. i wsp. Double door laminoplasty through longitudinal splitting of spinous process for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Clin Orthoo Surg 1984; 19: 483-490.
14. Kurokawa T. Enlargement of the spinal canal by the sagittal splitting of spinal processes. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 1982; 2: 234-240.
15. Takayasu M., Takagi T, Nishizawa T. i wsp. Bilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty with hydroxyapatite spacers and titanium screws. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2002; 96: 22-28.
16. Hidai Y., Ebara S., Kamimura M. i wsp. Treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy with a new dorsolateral decompressive procedure. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 1999; 90: 178-185.
17. Ohtsuka K., Wida K., Kinoshita H. Spinal canal plasty through the unilateral laminectomy for the cervical myelopathy, Chuba Nippon Seikeigeka Saigaigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1987 (Jpn); 31: 1360-1362.
18. Hosono N., Sakaura H., Mukai Y i wsp. En bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 2005; 1: 29-33.
19. Morimoto T, Matsuyama T, Hirabayashi H. i wsp. Expansive laminoplasty for multilevel cervical OPLL. J Spinal Disord 1997; 10: 296-298.
20. Japanese Orthopedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy, J Jpn Orthop Asso 1994; 68: 490-503.
21. Hirabayashi K., Miyakawa J., Satomi K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 1981; 6: 354-364.
22. Hirabayashi K., Toyama Y, Chiba K. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop 1999; 359: 35-48.
23. Hosono N., Yonenobu K., Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine 1996; 21: 1969-1973.
24. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M., Ishihara H. i wsp. Progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following en bloc cervical larninoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1798-1802.
25. Kimura I., Shingu H., Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 956-961.
26. Satomi K., Nishu Y., Kohno T. i wsp. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994; 19: 507-510.
27. Yonenobu K., Hosono N., Iwasaki M. i wsp. Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 1993; 16: 1277-1282.
28. Herkowitz H. A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 1988; 13: 774-790.
29. Herkowitz H. Cervical laminoplasty: its role in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Spinal Disord 1988; 1: 179-188.
30. Hirabayashi K., Bohlman K.H. Multilevel cervical spondylosis. Laminoplasty versus anterior decompression. Spine 1995; 20: 1732-1734.
31. Wada E., Suzuki S., Kanazawa A. i wsp. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001; 26: 1443-1448.
32. Tomita K., Nokuma S., Umeda S. i wsp. Cervical laminoplasty to enlarge the spinal canal in multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1988; 107: 148-153.
33. Harada A., Mimatsu K. Postoperative changes in the spinal cord in cervical myelopathy demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1992; 17: 1275-1280.
34. LaRocca H., MacNab I. The laminectomy membrane. Studies in its evaluation, characteristics, effects, and prophylaxis in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1974; 56: 545-550.
35. Scoville WB. Cervical spondylosis treated by bilateral facetectomy and laminectomy. J Neurosurg 1961; 18: 423-428.
36. Stoops WL. Neural complication of cervical spondylosis; their response to laminectomy and foraminotomy. J Neurosurg 1961; 1: 986-999.
37. Chiba K., Toyama Y., Matsumoto M. i wsp. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2002; 27: 2108-2115.
38. Tsuzuki N., Abe R., Saiki K. i wsp. Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 1996; 21: 203-211.
39. Tsuzuki N., Abe R., Saiki K. i wsp. Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Analyses of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 1993; 2: 197-202.
40. Uematsu Y., Tokuhashi Y., Matsuzaki H. Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine 1998; 23: 2057-2062.
41. Sakaura H., Hosono N., Mukai Y. i wsp. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Spine 2003; 28: 2447-2451.
42. Yonenobu K., Okada K., Fuji T. i wsp. Causes of neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine 1986; 11: 818-823.
43. Jimenez J.C., Sani S., Braverman B. i wsp. Palsies of the fifth cervical nerve root after cervical decompression: prevention using continuous intraoperative electromyography monitoring. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 2005; 2: 92-97.
44. Gore D.R., Sepic S.B., Gardner G.M. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 1986; 11: 521-524.
45. Kaptain G.J., Simmons NE., Replogle R.E. i wsp. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 2000; 93: 199-204.
46. Yasuoka S., Peterson H.A., Laws E.R. i wsp. Pathogenesis and prophylaxis of posdaminectomy deformity of the spine after multiple level laminectomy: difference between children and adults. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 145-152.
47. Pal G.P., Sherk H.H. The vertical stability of the cervical spine. Spine 1988; 13: 447-449.
48. Raynor R.B., Pugh J., Shapiro I. Cervical facetectomy and its effect on spine strength. J Neurosurg 1985; 63: 278-282.
49. Nolan J.P. Jr, Sherk H.H. Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine. Spine 1988; 13: 9-11.
50. Breig A., el-Nadi A.F Biomechanics of the cervical spinal cord. Relief of contact pressure on and overstretching of the spinal cord. Acta Radiol Diagn 1966; 4: 602-604.
51. Heller J.G., Edwards C.C., Murakami H. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 2001; 26: 1330-1336.