Disruption of latent inhibition by interpolation of task-irrelevant stimulation between preexposure and conditioning

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 371-385

  Escobar, Martha ^a   Arcediano, Francisco ^a   Miller, Ralph R ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; FEMALE; LATENT INHIBITION; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANIMAL; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STIMULATION; TIME;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33751038567     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192865     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BARNET, R. C., GRAHAME, N. J., & MILLER, R. R. (1993). Local time horizons in Pavlovian learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 215-230.
2. BOUTON, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
3. BRAUNSTEIN-BERCOVITZ, H., & LUBOW, R. E. (1998a). Are high-schizotypal normal participants distractible or limited in attentional resources? A study of latent inhibition as function of masking task load and schizotypy level. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 659-670.
4. BRAUNSTEIN-BERCOVITZ, H., & LUBOW, R. E. (1998b). Latent inhibition as a function of modulation of attention to the preexposed irrelevant stimulus. Learning & Motivation, 29, 261-279.
5. CHANNELL, S., & HALL, G. (1983). Contextual effects in latent inhibition with an appetitive conditioning procedure. Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 67-74.
6. DE LA CASA, L. G., & LUBOW, R. E. (2001). Latent inhibition with a response time measure from a within-subject design: Effects of number of preexposures, masking task, context change, and delay. Neuropsychology, 15, 244-253.
7. ESCOBAR, M., ARCEDIANO, F., & MILLER, R. R. (2003). Latent inhibition in human adults without masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1028-1040.
8. FAUL, F., & ERDFELDER, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn: Bonn University, Department of Psychology.
9. GINTON, A., URCA, G., & LUBOW, R. E. (1975). The effects of preexposure to a nonattended stimulus on subsequent learning: Latent inhibition in adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 5-8.
10. GRAHAM, S., & MCLAREN, I. P. L. (1998). Retardation in human discrimination learning as a consequence of pre-exposure: Latent inhibition or negative priming? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 155-172.
11. HALL, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. HULSTIJN, W. (1978). The orienting reaction during human eyelid conditioning following preconditioning exposures to the CS. Psychological Research, 40, 77-88.
13. KRAEMER, P. J., RANDALL, C. K., & CARBARY, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 139-145.
14. LANTZ, A. E. (1973). Effect of number of trials, interstimulus interval, and dishabituation during CS habituation on subsequent conditioning in a CER paradigm. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1, 273-277.
15. LIEBERMAN, D. A., MCINTOSH, D. C., & THOMAS, G. V. (1979). Learning when reward is delayed: A marking hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 224-242.
16. LOVIBOND, P. F., PRESTON, G. C., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
17. LUBOW, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
18. LUBOW, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. LUBOW, R. E., & GEWIRTZ, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87-103.
20. LUBOW, R. E., & MOORE, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 52, 415-419.
21. LUBOW, R. E., SCHNUR, P., & RIFKIN, B. (1976). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 163-174.
22. LUBOW, R. E., WEINER, I., & SCHNUR, P. (1981). Conditioned attention theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 1-49). New York: Academic Press.
23. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
24. MCLAREN, I. P. L., BENNETT, C., PLAISTED, K., AITKEN, M., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1994). Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 387-400.
25. MCLAREN, I. P L., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
26. MILLER, R. R., & MATZEL, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego: Academic Press.
27. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
28. RUDY, J. W., ROSENBERG, L., & SANDELL, J. H. (1977). Disruption of a taste familiarity effect by novel exteroceptive stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 26-36.
29. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
30. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic attentional processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
31. THOMAS, G. V., ROBERTSON, D., & LIEBERMAN, D. A. (1987). Marking effects in Pavlovian trace conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 126-135.
32. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
33. TIPPER, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
34. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.