Kalman filter and joint tracking and classification based on belief functions in the TBM framework

Information Fusion

Volumn 8, Issue 1 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 16-27

  Smets, Philippe ^a   Ristic, Branko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION   (Australia)

Author keywords

Belief function theory; Kalman filter; Target classification; Transferable belief model

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA HANDLING; FUNCTION EVALUATION; SET THEORY;

BAYESIAN CLASSIFIERS; BELIEF FUNCTION THEORIES; TARGET CLASSIFICATIONS; TRANSFERABLE BELIEF MODEL (TBM);

KALMAN FILTERING;

EID: 33751023755     PISSN: 15662535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. P. Smets, B. Ristic, Kalman filters and joint tracking and classification in the TBM framework, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Fusion, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004, pp. 46-53.
2. Challa S., and Pulford G.W. Joint target tracking and classification using radar and ESM sensors. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst. 37 3 (2001) 1039-1055
3. Farina A., Lombardo P., and Marsella M. Joint tracking and identification algorithms for multisensor data. IEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig. 149 6 (2002) 271-280
4. Gordon N., Maskell S., and Kirubarajan T. Efficient particle filters for joint tracking and classification. Proc. SPIE 4728 (2002) 439-449
5. Ristic B., Gordon N., and Bessell A. On target classification using kinematic data. Informat. Fus. 5 (2004) 15-21
6. Smets P. The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation. In: Gabbay D.M., and Smets P. (Eds). Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems vol. 1 (1998), Kluwer, Doordrecht, The Netherlands 267-301
7. Smets P. Practical uses of belief functions. In: Laskey K.B., and Prade H. (Eds). Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence vol. 99 (1999), Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA 612-621
8. P. Smets, Data fusion in the transferable belief model, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Information Fusion, FUSION 2000, Paris, France, 2000, pp. PS 21-33.
9. Smets P., and Kennes R. The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence 66 (1994) 191-234
10. Bar-Shalom V., Li X.R., and Kirubarajan T. Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation (2001), Wiley, New York
11. F. Delmotte, P. Smets, Target identification based on the transferable belief model interpretation of Dempster-Shafer model. Part 1: Methodology, technical report, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium., 50 av. Roosevelt, CP194/6, 1050 Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
12. Smets P. Belief functions: the disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 9 (1993) 1-35
13. Dempster A. Construction and local computation aspects of network belief functions. In: Oliver R.M., and Smith J.Q. (Eds). Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis (1990), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 121-141
14. Kohlas J., and Monney P.A. A mathematical theory of hints: An approach to Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 425 (1995), Springer-Verlag
15. P. Smets, Belief functions on real numbers, Submitted: see , 2004.
16. B. Ristic, P. Smets, Belief function theory on the continuous space with an application to model based classification, in: Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (IPMU-2004, ed.), 2004, pp. 1119-1126.
17. Smets P. What is Dempster-Shafer's model?. In: Yager R.R., Kacprzyk J., and Fedrizzi M. (Eds). Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence (1994), Wiley, New York 5-34
18. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (1976), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
19. Dempster A.P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiple valued mapping. Ann. Math. Statist. 38 (1967) 325-339
20. Smets P. Decision making in a context where uncertainty is represented by belief functions. In: Srivastava R.P., and Mock T. (Eds). Belief Functions in Business Decisions (2002), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 17-61
21. Smets P. Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 38 (2005) 133-147
22. Ben Yaghlane B., Smets P., and Mellouli K. Belief function independence: I. The marginal case. Int. J. Approx. Reas. 29 (2001) 47-70
23. Ben Yaghlane B., Smets P., and Mellouli K. Belief function independence: II. The conditional case. Int. J. Approx. Reas. 31 (2002) 31-75
24. Dubois D., and Prade H. The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning. In: Bouchon B., and Yager R.R. (Eds). Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (1987), Springer Verlag, Berlin 75-84