The worrying rise in the frequency of cesarian section;L'inquiétante augmentation du nombre de césariennes

Bulletin de l'Academie Nationale de Medecine

Volumn 190, Issue 4-5, 2006, Pages 905-913

  Blanc, Bernard ^a   Capelle, Marianne ^a   Bretelle, Florence ^a   Leclaire, Michèle ^a   Bouvenot, Julien ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE LA CONCEPTION   (France)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Legal; Liability; Professional practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751022447     PISSN: 00014079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4079(19)33273-x     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. BAUBEAU D., BUISSON G. - La pratique des césariennes : évolution et variabilité entre 1998 et 2001. DREES, 275, décembre 2003.
2. LANSAC J., CARBONNE B. - Taux de césariennes et mortalité périnatale en Europe en 2003. Les Brèves du Collège, 2006, 7, 1.
3. O'DRISCOLL K., FOLEY M. - Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates. Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 61, 1-5.
4. FOLEY M., ALARAB M., DALY L., KEANE D., MACQUILLAN K., O'HERLMITHY C. - Term neonatal asphyxial seizures and peripartum deaths : Lack of correlation with a rising cesarean delivery rate. AJOG, 2005, 192, 102-8.
5. CARTER (BS). - The definition of acute perinatal asphyxia. Clinic. Périnatologie, 1993, 20, 287-303.
6. Audipog .inserm.fr.
7. LYDON-ROCHELLE M., HOLT VL., EASTERLING TR., MARTIN DP. - Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N. Eng. J. Med., 2001, 345, 3-8.
8. MC MAHON M., LUTHER E., BOWES W., OLSHAN A. - Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N. Engl J. Med., 1996, 689-95.
9. MOZURKEWICH EL., HUTTON EK. - Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial labor : a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 183, 1187-97.
10. ALTHABE F., BELIZAN JM., VILLAR J., ALEXANDER S., BERGEL E., RAMOS S., ROMERO M., DONNER A., LINDMARK G., LANGER A., FARNOT U., CECATTI JG., CARROLI G., KESTLER E. -Latin American Caesarean Section Study Group. Related Articles, Links Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America : a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004, 363, 1934-40.
11. ABITBOL MM., BOWEN-ERICKSEN M., CASTILLO I., PUSHCHIN A. - Prediction of difficult vaginal birth and of cesarean section for cephalopelvic disproportion in early labor. J. Matern. Fetal. Med., 1999, 8, 51-6.
12. WEINSTEIN D., BENSHUSHAN A., TANOS V., ZILBERSTEIN R., ROJANSKY N. - Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 174, 192-8.
13. SHOJAI R., BOUBLI L., MARPEAU L. - Pour ou contre la césarienne de « convenance » ? Débat Gynécologie Obstétrique et Fertilité, 2004, 3, 347-351.
14. ALLEN VM., O'CONNELL CM., LISTON RM., BASKETT TF. - Related Articles, Links Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 102, 477-82.