The changing role of the Dutch social rented sector

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 315-335

  van Ham, Maarten ^a   van Kempen, Ronald ^b   van Weesep, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ethnicity; Housing tenure; Income; Social rented housing; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ANALYTICAL METHOD; HOUSING MARKET; HOUSING POLICY; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33750998809     PISSN: 15664910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-006-9052-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aalbers, M. (2003). Redlining in Nederland. Oorzaken en gevolgen van uitsluiting op de hypotheekmarkt. Amsterdam: Aksant.
2. Boelhouwer, P., & Priemus H. (1990). Dutch housing policy realigned. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 5, pp. 105-119.
3. CBS (2005). Statistisch Jaarboek. Statistics Netherlands. Heerlen/ Voorburg.
4. CBS Statline (2005). Statline (www.statline.nl). Statistics Netherlands. Heerlen/Voorburg.
5. Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C. & Dieleman, F. M. (1984). Residential mobility and housing adjustment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, pp. 29-43.
6. Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C. & Dieleman, F. M. (1986). Residential mobility in Dutch housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 18, 763-788.
7. Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C. & Dieleman, F. M. (1988). Modeling strategies for categorical data: Examples from housing and tenure choice. Geographical Analysis, 20, 196-219.
8. Clark, W. A. V., & Dieleman, F. M. (1996), Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market. New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research.
9. Deurloo, M. C., Dieleman, F. M., & Clark, W. A. V. (1987). Tenure choice in the Dutch housing market. Environment and Planning A, 19, 763-781.
10. Dieleman, F. M. (1971a). De centrale plaatsen theorie van Christaller. Geografisch Tijdschrift, 80, 453-563.
11. Dieleman, F. M. (1971b). Factoranalyse en multidimensionale groepering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, pp. 217-225.
12. Dieleman, F. M. (1986). The future of Dutch housing: A review and interpretation of the recent literature. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 77(5), 336-344.
13. Dieleman, F. M. (1994). Social rented housing: Valuable asset or unsustainable burden?. Urban Studies, 31, 447-463.
14. Dieleman, F. M., & Jobse, R. (1974). An economic spatial structure of Amsterdam. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 65(5), 351-367.
15. Dieleman, F. M., & van Weesep, J. (1986). Housing under fire: Budget cuts, policy adjustments and market changes. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 77, 310-315.
16. Dieleman, F. M. & Priemus H. (eds.) (1988). Beyond social housing. Built Environment, 14, pp. 139-219 (special issue).
17. Heida, H. R., & Gordijn, H. E. (1985), Het PRIMOS-huishoudensmodel. Delft: Planologisch Studiecentrum/TNO.
18. Meusen, H. & van Kempen R. (1994). Dutch Social Rented Housing: A British Experience? Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol.
19. Meusen, H., & van Kempen, R. (1995). Towards residual housing? A comparison of Britain and the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 10, 239-258.
20. Ministerie VROM (1989). Nota Volkshuisvesting in de jaren negentig. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
21. Ministerie VROM (1997). Nota stedelijke Vernieuwing. Den Haag: Ministerie van VROM.
22. Ministerie VROM (2000). Cijfers over wonen 2000/2001: Feiten over mensen, wensen, wonen. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting. Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer. Den Haag.
23. Ministerie VROM (2004). Cijfers over wonen 2004: Feiten over mensen, wensen, wonen. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting. Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer. Den Haag.
24. Murie, A., & Priemus, H. (1994). Social rented housing in Britain and the Netherlands: Trends, trajectories and divergence. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 9, 107-126.
25. Musterd, S., & Dieleman, F. M. (1981). Scaling methods: Measurement of the service level of centers in Noord-Brabant (The Netherlands). Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 72, 310-315.
26. Priemus, H. (1995). How to abolish social housing? The Dutch case. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 19, 145-155.
27. Priemus, H., & Dieleman, F. M. (2002). Social housing policy in the European Union. Urban Studies, 39(2), 191-200.
28. Schutjens, V. A. J. M., van Kempen, R., & van Weesep, J. (2002). The changing tenant profile of Dutch social rented housing. Urban Studies, 39(4), 643-664.
29. Van Kempen, R., & Priemus, H. (2002). Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: Possible effects of new housing policies. Urban Studies, 39 (2), 237-253.
30. Van Kempen, R., Schutjens, V. A. J. M., & van Weesep, J. (2000). Housing and social fragmentation in the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 15(4), 505-531.
31. Van Kersbergen, K., & Becker, U. (1988). The Netherlands: A passive social democratic welfare state in a Christian Democratic ruled society. Journal of Soial Policy, 17, 477-499.