Management as a design science mindful of art and surprise: A conversation between Anne Huff, David Tranfield, and Joan Ernst van Aken

Journal of Management Inquiry

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 413-424

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750983356     PISSN: 10564926     EISSN: 15526542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1056492606295900     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beer, M. (2001). Why management research findings are unimplementable: An action science perspective. Reflections of the Society for Organizational Learning, 2, 58-65.
2. Bennis, W. G., & O'Toole, J. (2005, May). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business School, 96-104.
3. Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
4. Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. A. (1994). Artifacts and the designer's process: Implications for computer support to design. Revue Sciences et techniques de la Conception, 3 (1). 11-31.
5. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1). 1-25.
6. Follett, M. P. (1998). The new state: Group organization the solution of popular government. Pennsylvania Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. New York: Longman, Green. (Original work published 1917)
7. Gouldner, A. (1971). The coming crisis of western sociology. London: Heinemann.
8. Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). Editorial to the special issue. British Journal of Management, 12, S1 - S2.
9. Huff, A. S. (2005). Presidential address: Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 25 (2). 288-293.
10. Huff, A. S., & Huff, J. O. (2001). Re-focusing the business school agenda [Special issue]. British Journal of Management, 12, S49 - S54.
11. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari. New York: Free Press.
12. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). The double hurdles for management research. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Advancement in organizational behaviour: Essays in honour of D.S. Pugh (pp. 277-296). London: Dartmouth Press.
13. Quinn, B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
14. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction. Handbook of action research. London: Sage.
15. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
16. Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Thompson, J. D. (1956). On building an administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 102-111.
18. Tranfield, D. R., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. K. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing an evidence-informed approach to management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3). 207-223.
19. Tranfield, D. R., & Starkey, K. (1998). The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British Journal of Management, 9, 341-352.
20. van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (2). 219-246.
21. van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production. British Journal of Management, 16, 19-36.
22. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. E. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Wrapp, H. E. (1967, September). Good managers don't make policy decisions. Harvard Business Review, 91-99.