The Katrina aftermath: A failure of federalism or leadership?

Public Administration Review

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 808-812

  Menzel, Donald C ^a,b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA SARASOTA MANATEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750978985     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00649.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Institute for the Study of Public Policy Implementation. 2005. The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: American University. www.spa.american.edu/isppi/bptw.php [accessed July 31, 2006].
2. Krugman, Paul. 2005. A Can't-Do Government. New York Times, September 2.
3. Parker, Gretchen. 2006. Every Man for Himself. Tampa Tribune, May 21.
4. Townsend, Frances Fragos. 2006. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. www.whitehouse.gov/ reports/katrina-lessons-learned/ [accessed August 2, 2006].
5. U.S. House Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. 2006. A Failure of Initiative. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://katrina.house.gov/ full_katrina_report.htm [accessed August 2, 2006].
6. Wise, Charles R. 2006. Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina: Is Adaptive Management What's Missing? Public Administration Review 66(3): 302-18.