Revisiting LISYS: Parameters and normal behavior

Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2002

Volumn 2, Issue , 2002, Pages 1045-1050

  Balthrop, Justin ^a   Forrest, Stephanie ^a   Glickman, Matthew R ^a  

^a University of New Mexico   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

ARTIFICIAL IMMUNE SYSTEM; DATA SET; FALSE POSITIVE; NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION; NORMAL BEHAVIOR; PARAMETER SETTING;

INTRUSION DETECTION;

EID: 33750972259     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2002.1004387     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. Dasgupta. Immunity-based intrusion detection system: A general framework. In Proc. of the 22nd National Information Systems Security Conf. 1999.
2. P. D'haeseleer. An immunological approach to change detection: theoretical results. In Proc. of the 9th IEEE Comp. Security Foundations Workshop. . IEEE Comp. Society Press, 1996.
3. P. D'haeseleer, S. Forrest, and P. Helman. An immunological approach to change detection: algorithms, Analysis and implications. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Computer Security and Privacy. IEEE Press, 1996.
4. F. Esponda. Detector coverage with the r-contiguous bits matching rule. Tech. Report TR-CS-2002-03, UNM, 2002.
5. S. Forrest, A. S. Perelson, L. Allen, and R. C. Kuri. Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In Proc. of the IEEE Symp. on Research in Security and Privacy. IEEE Press, 1994.
6. L. Heberlein, G. Dias, K. Levitte, B. Mukherjee, J. Wood, and D. Wolber. A network security monitor. In Proc. of the IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy. IEE Press, 1990.
7. S. Hofmeyr. An Immunological Model of Distributed Detection and its Application to Computer Security. PhD ths. UNM, 1999.
8. S. Hofmeyr and S. Forrest. Architecture for an artificial immune system. Evolutionary Comp. Jrnl. 8(4)443-473, 2000.
9. K. Ingham, 2001. Personal communication.
10. J. Kim and P. Bentley. The artificial immune model for network intrusion detection. In 7th European Conf. on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing. Aachen, Germany, 1999.
11. J. Kim and P. Bentley. Negative selection and niching by an artificial immune system for network intrusion detection. In GECCO-99 Proceedings, p. 149-158, 1999.
12. J. Kim and P. Bentley. An evaluation of negative selection in an artificial immune system for network intrusion detection. In GECCO-2001 Proceedings, p. 1330-1337, 2001.
13. J. McHugh. Testing intrusion detection systems: A critique of the 1998 and 1999 DARPA intrusion detection system evaluations as performed by Lincoln Laboratory. In ACM Transactions, November 2000, 3(4):262-294, ACM, 2000.
14. B. Mukherjee, L. T. Heberlein, and K. N. Levitt. Network intrusion detection. IEEE Network, pages 26-41, 1994.
15. J. Percus, O. Percus, and A. Perelson. Predicting the size of the antibody combining region from consideration of efficient self/non-self discrimination. Proc. of the National Academy of Science, 90:1691-1695, 1993.
16. S. T. Wierzchon. Discriminative power of the receptors activated by k-contiguous bits rule. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 1(3):1-13, 2000.
17. S. T. Wierzchon. Generating optimal repertoire of antibody strings in an artificial immune system, In Intelligent Information Systems, 119 133, 2000.
18. S. T. Wierzchon. Deriving concise description of non-self patterns in an artificial immune system. In New Learnrng Paradigm in Soft Computing, 438-458, 2001.
19. P. Williams, K. Anchor, J. Bebo, G. Gunsch, and G. Lamont. CDIS: Towards a computer immune system for detecting network intrusions. In RAID 2001, 2212:117-133, 2001.