Balanced scorecard for performance evaluation of R&D organization: A conceptual model

Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 879-886

  Jyoti, ^a   Banwet, D K ^a   Deshmukh, S G ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Performance measurement; R D organizations

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

COMPETITIVENESS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33750969105     PISSN: 00224456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Loch C H & Tapper U A S, Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group, J Product Innovation Manage, 19 (2001) 185-198.
2. Hsu K H, Using balanced scorecard and fuzzy data envelopment analysis for multinational R&D project performance assessment, J Am Academy Business, 7 (2005) 189-196.
3. Maisel C S, Performance measurement: The balanced scorecard approach, J Cost Manage, Fall (1992) 47-52.
4. Campi J P, It's not easy as ABC, J Cost management, Summer (1992) 5-11.
5. Hoffecker J & Goldenberg C, Using the balanced scorecard to develop company wide performance measures, J Cost Manage, Fall (1994) 5-17.
6. Kaplan R S & Norton D P, The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Rev, 70(1) (1992) 71-79.
7. Brown M G & Svenson R A, Measuring R&D productivity, Res Technol Manage, 41 (1998) 30-35.
8. Jain R K & Triandis H C, Management of Research and Development Organizations: Managing the Unmanageable, edn 2 (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) 1997.
9. Kim B & Oh H, An effective R&D performance measurement system: Survey of Korean R&D researchers, Omega, 30 (2002) 19-31.
10. Hauser J R & Zettelmeyer F, Metrics to evaluate R, D & E, Res Technol Manage, 40 (1997) 32-38.
11. Neely A, Mills J, Platts K, Gregory M & Richards H, Performance measurement system design: should process based approaches be adopted, Int J Prod Econ, 46-47 (1996) 423-431.
12. Fortune L, Performance indicators: Why, where and how? Eur J Operations Res, 34 (1998) 1-9
13. Horne S M, Vital Signs - Using Quality, Time, and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company's Future (Amacom, New York) 1993.
14. Maskell B, Performance measurement for world-class manufacturing, Manage Accounting, (1989) 32-33.
15. Crawford K M, & Cox J F, Designing performance measurement systems for just-in-time operations, Int J Production Res, 34 (1990) 2025-2036.
16. Bungay S, & Goold M, Creating a strategic control system, Long Range Planning, 24 (1991) 32-39.
17. Hayes R H, Wheelwright S C & Clark K B, Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organizations (Free Press, New York) 1988.
18. CAM-I, Minutes of the Meeting held in Milan, Italy, 23-24 April 1991, 19.
19. ICAS, Measurement: The Total Picture (Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Scotland) 1993.
20. Fitzgerald, L, Johnston R, Brignall S, Silvestro R & Voss C, Performance Measurement in Service Business, (CIMA, London) 1991.
21. Fry T D & Cox J F, Manufacturing performance: local versus global measures, Prod. Inv Mgmt J, 30(2) (1989) 52-56.
22. Skinner W, The Anachronistic factory, Harvard Business Review, (1971) 61-70.
23. IPM, Performance management of UK: An analysis of the Issues, IPS/IMS, 1992.
24. Kaplan R S & Norton D P, The balanced scorecard-translating strategy into action, in The Balance on the balanced scorecard - A critical analysis of some of its assumptions, by H Norreklit, Management Accounting Research, 11 (2000) 65-88.