Robustness of coalescent estimators to between-lineage mutation rate variation

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2355-2360

  Kuhner, Mary K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescent; Maximum likelihood; Mutation rate variation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CELL LINEAGE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MOLECULAR CLOCK; MUTATION RATE; POPULATION GENETICS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; CELL LINEAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTATION; PEDIGREE;

EID: 33750965477     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl106     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4:e88.
2. Drummond AJ, Nicholis GK, Rodrigo AG, Solomon W. 2002. Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics. 161:1307-1320.
3. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 17:368-376.
4. Goldman N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J Mol Evol. 36:182-198.
5. Griffiths RC, Tavaré S. 1993. Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 344:403-410.
6. Hudson RR. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf Surv Evol Biol. 7:1-44.
7. Kimura M. 1980. A simple model for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111-120.
8. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol. 31:151-160.
9. Kuhner MK. 2006. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics. 22(6):768-770.
10. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J. 1995. Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics. 140:1421-1430.
11. Maley CC, Galipeau PC, Li X, Sanchez CA, Paulson TG, Reid BJ. 2004. Selectively advantageous mutations and hitchhikers in neoplasms. Cancer Res. 64:3414-3427.
12. Nielsen R, Wakeley J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics. 158:885-896.
13. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2003. Tracer v1.3 [Internet]. Oxford (UK): University of Oxford [cited 2006 April 26]. Available from: http://evolve.zoo. ox.ac.uk/.
14. Rodrigo AG, Felsenstein J. 1999. Coalescent approaches to HIV population genetics. In: Crandall K, editor. Molecular evolution of HIV. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 233-272.
15. Rodrigo AG, Shpaer EG, Delwarts EL, Iversen AKN, Gallo MV, Brojatsch J, Hirsch MS, Walker BD, Mullins JI. 1999. Coalescent estimates of HIV-1 generation time in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:2187-2191.
16. Salemi M, Lamers SL, Yu S, de Oliveira T, Fitch WM, McGrath MS. 2005. Phylodynamic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in distinct brain compartments provides a model for the neuropathogenesis of AIDS. J Virol. 79:11343-11352.
17. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical systems without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7:256-276.