Comparison of different methods in order to identify Proteus spp.;Comparación de diferentes métodos para identificar las especies del género Proteus

Revista Argentina de Microbiologia

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 119-124

  Castro, S T ^a   Rodriguez, C R ^a   Perazzi, B E ^a   Radice, M ^b   Paz Sticotti, M ^b   Muzio, H ^b   Juarez, J ^a   Gutkind, G ^b   Famiglietti, A M R ^a   Santini, P I ^b   Vay, C A ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS JOSÉ DE SAN MARTÍN   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Genus Proteus; Identification

Indexed keywords

ACID; MALTOSE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEUS; PROTEUS MIRABILIS; PROTEUS PENNERI; PROTEUS VULGARIS;

BACTERIAL TYPING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PROTEUS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33750957073     PISSN: 03257541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abbott SL. Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Serratia, Plesiomonas and other Enterobacteriaceae. En: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Washington D.C., ASM Press, 2003, p. 684-700.
2. Brenner DJ, Farmer JJ, Fanning GR, Steigerwalt AG, Klykken P, Wathen HG et al. Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness of Proteus and Providencia species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28: 269-82.
3. Costas M, Holmes B, Frith KA, Riddle C, Hawkey PM. Identification and typing of Proteus penneri and Proteus vulgaris biogroups 2 and 3, from clinical sources, by computerized analysis of electrophoretic protein patterns. J Appl Bacteriol 1993; 75: 489-98.
4. Farmer JJ, Davis BR, Hickman-Brenner FW, Mc. Whorter AC, Huntley-Carter GP, Asbury MA et al. Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21: 46-76.
5. Gómez A, Baquero F, Nombela C. El género Proteus: aspectos microbiológicos y clínicos. Enf Inf Microbiol Clin 1991; 9: 567-75.
6. Holmes B, Costas M, Wood AC. Typing of Proteus mirabilis from clinical sources by computerized analysis of electrophoretic protein patterns. J Appl Bacteriol 1991; 71: 46-76.
7. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680-5.
8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Abbreviated identification of bacteria and yeast; approved guideline. Proteus spp, 2002; p. 5; M35-A. Wayne, Pa, USA.
9. O'Hara CM, Hickman-Brenner FW, Miller JM. Classification, identification and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13: 534-46.
10. O'Hara CM, Rhoden DL, Miller JM. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 123-5.
11. O'Hara CM, Tenover FC, Miller JM. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk / A way Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 3165-9.
12. Petras G, Bognar S. Origin and spread Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus and Klebsiella in an infectious hospital. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci. Hung 1981; 28: 367-80.
13. Rodríguez C, Radice M, Perazzi B, Castro S, Juárez J, Santini P et al. Resistencia enzimática a betalactámicos en el género Proteus y evaluación de los fenotipos y genotipos de resistencia a cefalosporinas de tercera y cuarta generación en Proteus mirabilis. Enf Inf Microbiol Clin 2005; 23: 122-6.
14. Ruimy R, Breittmayer V, Elbaze P, Lafay B, Boussemart O, Gauthier M et al. Phylogenetic analysis and assesment of the genera Vibrio, Photobacterium, Aeromonas and Plesiomonas deduced from small-subunit rRNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44: 416-26.