DeDiSys Lite: An environment for evaluating replication protocols in partitionable distributed object systems

Proceedings - First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2006

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 408-415

  Beyer, Stefan ^a   Sánchez, Alexander ^a   Muñoz Escoí, Francesc D ^a   Galdámez, Pablo ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE INFORMÁTICA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DEDISYS SYSTEM; DISTRIBUTED OBJECT SYSTEM;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750953796     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ARES.2006.44     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Y. Amir, C. Danilov, and J. R. Stanton. A low latency, loss tolerant architecture and protocol for wide area group communication. In DSN '00: Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (formerly FTCS-30 and DCCA-8), pages 327-336, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer Society.
2. S. Beyer, M. Bañuls, P. Galdámez, and E D. Muñoz-Escoí. Increasing availability in a replicated pardonable distributed object system. Technical Report ITI-ITE-05/10, Instituto Tecnológico de Informática, 2005.
3. N. Budhiraja, K. Marzullo, F. B. Schneider, and S. Toueg. The primary-backup approach, pages 199-216. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1993.
4. F. Cristian. Understanding fault-tolerant distributed systems. Commun. ACM, 34(2):56-78, 1991.
5. M. Cukier, J. Ren, C. Sabnis, D. Henke, J. Pistole, W. H. Sanders, D. E. Bakken, M. E. Berman, D. A. Karr, and R. E. Schantz. Aqua: An adaptive architecture that provides dependable distributed objects. In SRDS '98: Proceedings of the The 17th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, page 245, 1998.
6. C. Ferdean and M. Makpangou. A generic and flexible model for replica consistency management. In ICDCIT, pages 204-209, 2004.
7. R. Guerraoui and A. Schiper. Software-based replication for fault tolerance. Computer, 30(4):68-74, 1997.
8. L. E. Moser, Y. Amir, P. M. Melliar-Smith, and D. A. Agarwal. Extended virtual synchrony. In The 14th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 56-65, 1994.
9. E. B. Moss. Nested transactions: an approach to reliable distributed computing. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981.
10. J. Osrael, L. Froihofer, K. M. Goeschka, S. Beyer, F. D. Muñoz-Escoí, and P. Galdámez. A system architecture for enhanced availability of tightly coupled distributed systems. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 2006.
11. A. Ricciardi, A. Schiper, and K. Birman. Understanding partitions and the "non partition" assumption. In IEEE Proc Fourth Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Systems, 1993.
12. F. B. Schneider. What good are models and what models are good? In Distributed Systems, chapter 2, pages 17-26. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 2nd edition, 1993.
13. J. Warmer and A. Kleppe. OCL: The constraint language of the UML. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, May 1999.
14. H. Yu and A. Vahdat. Design and evaluation of a conit-based continuous consistency model for replicated services. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 20(3):239-282, 2002.