Ad hoc routing protocol performance in a realistic environment

Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies,ICN/ICONS/MCL'06

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 96-105

  Marinoni, Stefano ^a   Kari, Hannu H ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; ROUTERS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

AD HOC ROUTING PROTOCOL; SIMULATION MODELS; URBAN MOBILITY MODEL (UMM); WIRELESS DEVICES;

TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

EID: 33750953634     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICNICONSMCL.2006.39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. R. at UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and X. PARC. The ns Manual. VINT Project. March 2005.
2. F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy. IMPORTANT: A Framework to Systematically Analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks, INFOCOM 2003.
3. C. Bettstetter. Mobility Modeling in Wireless Networks: categorization, smooth movement, and border effects. SIGMOBILEMob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 5(3):55-66, 2001.
4. C. Bettstetter. Smooth is Better than Sharp: a Random Mobility Model for Simulation of Wireless Networks. In MSWIM '01: Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, pages 19-27. ACM Press, 2001.
5. A. Boukerche. Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. Mob. Netw. Appl., 2004.
6. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. October 1998.
7. T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research. Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing (WCMC), 2(5):483-502, September 2002. Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research Trend and Applications.
8. Charles E. Perkins and Elizabeth M. Royer. Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing. In Proceedings of the WMCSA, pages 90-100, February 1999.
9. C. Chiang. Wireless Networks Multicasting. PhD Dissertation Prospectus. The University of California 1999.
10. V. A. Davies. Evaluating Mobility Models within an Ad Hoc Network. Master's thesis, Colorado School of Mines, USA, Colorado, 2000.
11. I. Gruber, A. Baessler, and H. Li. Performance of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols in Urban Environments. In European Wireless 2004 (EW'2004), February 2004.
12. A. Jardosh, E. M. Belding-Royer, K. C. Almeroth, and S. Suri. Towards Realistic Mobility Models for Mobile ad Hoc Networks. In Mobicom, 2003, pages 14-19, September 2003.
13. P. Johansson, T. Larsson, N. Hedman, B. Mielczarek, and M. Degermark. Scenario-based Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. In 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom), pages 195-206, 1999.
14. D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz. Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. In Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, 1996.
15. D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, and Y.-C. Hu. The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, IETF Draft - MANET working group, July 2005.
16. D. Lang. A Comprehensive Overview about selected Ad Hoc Networking Routing Protocols. Department of Computer Science, Technische Universitäat München, Germany. March 2003.
17. S. Marinoni. Performance of Wireless Ad Hoc Routing Protocols - A Simulation Study in Realistic Environments. Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, May 2005.
18. Network Simulator 2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/. URL retrieved on March 2005.
19. C. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers. In ACM SIGCOMM'94 Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications, pages 234-244, October 1994.
20. E. Royer and C. Toh. A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad-Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks, 1999.
21. J. Yoon, M. Liu, and B. Noble. Random Wayoint Considered Harmful. In INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies IEEE, volume 2, pages 1312-1321 vol.2, April 2003.
22. Q. Zheng, X. Hong, and S. Ray. Recent Advances in Mobility Modeling for Mobile ad Hoc Network Research. In ACM-SE 42: Proceedings of the 42nd annual Southeast regional conference, pages 70-75. ACM Press, 2004.