Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1136, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 89-98

  Catalan, Lionel J J ^a   Liang, Victor ^a,b   Jia, Charles Q ^b  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Detection limit; Gas chromatography; PFPD; Pulsed flame photometric detector; Sulphur; Volatile sulphur compounds

Indexed keywords

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; PHOTODETECTORS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

COST EFFECTIVE MEASURE; DETECTION LIMIT; PULSED FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTOR (PFPD); VOLATILE SULPHUR COMPOUNDS;

CHEMICAL SENSORS;

CARBON DISULFIDE; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; NITROGEN; SULFUR DERIVATIVE; SULFUR DIOXIDE; VOLATILE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FLAME PHOTOMETRY; GAS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 33750941202     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. T.L.C. de Souza, in: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-Technical Section, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Preprints, Part A, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Montreal, 1992, p. 23.
2. Inomata Y., Matsunaga K., Murai Y., Osada K., and Iwasaka Y. J. Chromatogr. A 864 (1999) 111
3. Sye W.-F., and Chen W.-Y. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 77 (2000) 207
4. Kim K.H. Atmos. Environ. 39 (2005) 2235
5. Kim K.H., Choi G.H., Choi Y.J., Song H.N., Yang H.S., and Oh J.M. Talanta 68 (2006) 1713
6. Kim K.H. Anal. Chim. Acta 566 (2006) 75
7. R.L. Firor, B.D. Quimby, A comparison of sulfur selective detectors for low-level analysis in gaseous streams, Application Note 5988-2426EN, Agilent Technologies, 16 August 2001.
8. Amirav A., and Jing H.W. Anal. Chem. 67 (1995) 3305
9. Cheskis S., Atar E., and Amirav A. Anal. Chem. 65 (1993) 539
10. E.D. Winegar, in: Proceedings of AWMA Air Quality Measurements Methods and Technology Symposium, 13-15 November 2002, Paper 102.
11. L.J.J. Catalan, in: Proceedings of AWMA Air Quality Measurements Methods and Technology Symposium, Durham, NC, 9-11 May 2006. Air&Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.
12. Kim K.H., Choi Y.J., Jeon E.C., and Sunwoo Y. Atmos. Environ. 39 (2005) 1103
13. Kim K.H. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 6765
14. Kim K.Y., Ju D.W., and Joo S.W. Talanta 67 (2005) 955
15. Lestremau F., Desauziers V., Roux J.C., and Fanlo J.L. J. Chromatogr. A 999 (2003) 71
16. Pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD) for CP-3800, Operator's manual, 03-914657-00:4, Varian Analytical Instruments, Walnut Creek, CA, 2001.
17. Wardencki W. J. Chromatogr. A 793 (1998) 1
18. American Chemical Society. Anal. Chem. 52 (1980) 2242
19. Willard H., Meritt L., Dean J., and Settle F. Instrumental Methods of Analysis. seventh ed. (1988), Wadsworth Publ., Belmont, CA p. 15
20. Federal Register, Definition and procedure for determination of the method detection limit, 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B, Revision 1.11.
21. Hubaux A., and Vos G. Anal. Chem. 42 (1970) 849
22. Detection Limit Procedure Based on Hubaux-Vos, US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water, September 2005. available online at http://www.epa.gov/ost/methods/det/faca/techworkgroup/hubaux.pdf.
23. R.P. Jones, J.U. Clarke, Analytical chemistry detection limits and the evaluation of dredged sediments, ERDC/TN EEDP-04-36, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, 2005.