Dynamic role binding in a service oriented architecture

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 190, Issue , 2005, Pages 109-122

  Cástejon, Humberto Nicolás ^a   Bræk, Rólv ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; INFORMATION SERVICES;

CONTEXT DEPENDENCY; POLICY FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE LIMITATIONS; SERVICE COMPONENTS; SERVICE EXECUTION; SERVICE INTERACTION; SERVICE MODULARITY; SYSTEM COMPONENTS;

SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

EID: 33750936823     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-32015-6_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Amer, M., Karmouch, A., Gray, T. and Mankovski, S. (2000). Feature-interaction resolution using fuzzy policies. In Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VI, pages 94-112, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
2. Bordeleau, F., Corriveau, J. P. and Selic, B. (2000). A scenario-based approach to hierarchical state machine design. In IS ORG '00: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, page 78. IEEE Computer Society.
3. Braek, R. and Hangen, O. (1993). Engineering Real Time Systems. An objectoriented methodology using SDL. Prentice Hall.
4. Braek, R. (1999). Using roles with types and objects for service development. In IFIP TC6 WG6.7 Fifth International Conference on Intelligence in Networks (SMARTNET), pages 265-278, Pathumthani, Thailand. Kluwer.
5. Braek, R., Husa, K. E. and Melby, G. (2002). ServiceFrame: WhitePaper. White paper, Ericsson Norarc. Available at: http://www.pats.no/devzone/platforms/ ServiceFrame/doc/ServiceFrame Whitepaperv8.pdf.
6. Braek, R. and Floch, J. (2004). IGT convergence: Modeling issues. In System Analysis and Modeling (SAM), 4th International SDL and MSC Workshop, pages 237-256, Ottawa, Canada.
7. Gastejon, H. N. (2005). Synthesizing state-machine behaviour from UML collaborations and Use Case Maps. In Prinz, Andreas, Reed, Rick, and Reed, Jeanne, editors, 12th SDL Forum, volume 3530 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 339-359, Grimstad, Norway. Springer.
8. Floch, J. (2003). Towards Plug-and-Play Services: Design and Validation using Roles. PhD thesis. Department of Telematics, Norwegain Univ. Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
9. Krüger, I. H., Gupta, D., Mathew, R., Moorthy, P., Philhps, W., Rittmann, S. and Ahluwalia, J. (2004). Towards a process and tool-chain for service-oriented automotive software engineering. In Proceedings of the ICSE 2004 Workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems (SEAS).
10. Lennox, J., Wu, X. and Schulzrinne, H. (2004). Call Processing Language (CPL): A language for user control of internet telephony services. RFC 3880, IETF.
11. Lupu, E. C, and Sloman, M. (1999). Conflicts in policy-based distributed systems management. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 25(6):852-869.
12. Niemeyer, P. (1997). BeanShell-lightweight scripting for Java. Available at: http://www.beanshell.org/.
13. Object Management Group (2004). UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification.
14. Program for Advanced Telecom Services (PATS). Accessible at: http://www.pats.no.
15. Pham, Q. T. (2005). Policy-based service personalization. Master's thesis, Dept. of Telematics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
16. Reiff'-Marganiec, S. and Turner, K. J. (2003). A policy architecture for enhancing and controlling features. In Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VII, pages 239-246, Ottawa, Canada.
17. Sanders, R. T., Castejon, H. N., Kraemer, F. A. and Braek, R. (2005). Using UML 2.0 collaborations for compositional service specification. In ACM/IEEE 8th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS), Montego Bay, Jamaica.
18. Sanders, R. T., Braek, R., Bochmann, G. v. and Amyot, D. (2005). Service discovery and component reuse with semantic interfaces. In 12th SDL Forum, Grimstad, Norway.
19. Stoyle, A. K. (2003). Flexible user agent. Technical report, Dept. of Telematics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
20. Zave, P. (2003). Feature disambiguation. In Feature Interactions in Telecommunications and Software Systems VII, pages 3-9, Ottawa, Canada.
21. Zibman, I., Woolf, C, O'Reilly, P., Strickland, L., Willis, D. and Visser, J. (1995). Minimizing feature interactions: An architecture and processing model approach. In Feature Interactions in Telecommunications III, pages 65-83, Kyoto, Japan.