Discrimination of real and virtual high-definition textured surfaces

14th Symposium onHaptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment andTeleoperator Systems 2006 - Proceedings

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 3-9

  Tan, Hong Z ^a   Adelstein, Bernard D ^b   Traylor, Ryan ^a   Kocsis, Matthew ^a   Hirleman, E Dan ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Real texture; Texture perception; Virtual texture

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE DISCRIMINATION; REAL TEXTURES; TEXTURE PERCEPTION; VIRTUAL TEXTURES;

DIFFRACTION GRATINGS; FABRICATION; HAPTIC INTERFACES; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THRESHOLD ELEMENTS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 33750932209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Buttolo, P., Kung, D., & Hannaford, B. (1995). Manipulation in Real, Virtual, and Remote Environments. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 5, 4656-4661.
2. Choi, S., & Tan, H. Z. (2005). Perceived instability of virtual haptic texture. II. Effect of collision detection algorithm. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(4), 463-481.
3. Connor, C. E., Hsiao, S. S., Phillips, J. R., & Johnson, K. O. (1990). Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3823-3836.
4. Connor, C. E., & Johnson, K. O. (1992). Neural coding of tactile texture: Comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 3414-3426.
5. Greenish, S., Hayward, V., Chial, V., Okamura, A., & Steffen, T. (2002). Measurement, analysis, and display of haptic signals during surgical cutting. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(6), 626-651.
6. Ho, C., Basdogan, C., & Srinivasan, M. A. (1999). Efficient point-based rendering techniques for haptic display of virtual objects. Presence, 8(5), 477-491.
7. Ho, P. P., Adelstein, B. D., & Kazerooni, H. (2004). Judging 2D versus 3D square-wave virtual gratings. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS '04), 176-183.
8. Hollins, M., Faldowski, R., Rao, S., & Young, F. (1993). Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(6), 697-705.
9. Katz, D. (1925/1989). The World of Touch. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1999). Tactile roughness perception with a rigid link interposed between skin and surface. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(4), 591-607.
11. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., Hamilton, C., Grindley, M., & Swendsen, R. H. (2003). Feeling textures through a probe: Effects of probe and surface geometry and exploratory factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 613-631.
12. Lawrence, D. A., Pao, L. Y., Dougherty, A. M., Salada, M. A., & Pavlou, Y. (2000). Rate-hardness: A new performance metric for haptic interface. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 16(4), 357-371.
13. Lederman, S. J. (1974). Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(2), 385-395.
14. Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., Hamilton, C. L., & Ramsay, G. I. (1999). Perceiving roughness via a rigid probe: Psychophysical effects of exploration speed and mode of touch. Haptics-e: The Electronic Journal for Haptics Research, 1(1), http://www.haptics-e.org.
15. Lederman, S. J., & Taylor, M. M. (1972). Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(5), 401-408.
16. Lederman, S. J., Thorne, G., & Jones, B. (1986). Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(2), 169-180.
17. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection Theory: A User's Guide (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Massie, T. H. (1996). Initial haptic explorations with the PHANToM: Virtual touch through point interaction. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Nefs, H. T., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2001). Amplitude and spatial-period discrimination in sinusoidal gratings by dynamic touch. Perception, 30, 1263-1274.
20. Nefs, H. T., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2003). Detection of amplitude modulation and frequency modulation in tactual gratings: A critical bandwidth for active touch. Perception, 32(10), 1259-1271.
21. O'Malley, M. K., & Goldfarb, M. (2005). On the ability of humans to haptically identify and discriminate real and simulated objects. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(3), 366-376.
22. Pang, X. D., Tan, H. Z., & Durlach, N. I. (1991). Manual discrimination of force using active finger motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(6), 531-540.
23. Poling, G. L., & Weisenberger, J. M. (2004). Multisensory roughness perception of virtual surfaces: effects of correlated cues. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS '04), 161-168.
24. Rosenberg, L. B., & Adelstein, B. D. (1993). Perceptual Decomposition of Virtual Haptic Surfaces, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality (pp. 46-53). San Jose, CA.
25. Steger, R., Lin, K., Adelstein, B. D., & Kazerooni, H. (2004). Design of a passively balanced spatial linkage haptic interface. ASME J. Mech. Des., 126, 984-991.
26. Stevens, S. S., & Harris, J. R. (1962). The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 489-494.
27. Traylor, R., Wilhelm, D., Adelstein, B. D., & Tan, H. Z. (2005). Design considerations for stand-alone haptic interfaces communicating via UDP protocol, Proceedings of the 2005 World Haptics Conference (WHC05): The First Joint EuroHaptics Conference and the Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (pp. 563-564). Pisa, Italy, Mar. 18-20.
28. Unger, B. J., Nicolaidis, A., Berkelman, P. J., Thompson, A., Lederman, S., Klatzky, R. L., & Hollis, R. L. (2002). Virtual peg-in-hole performance using a 6-DOF magnetic levitation haptic device: Comparison with real forces and with visual guidance alone. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 263-270.
29. Weisenberger, J. M., & Krier, M. J. (1997). Haptic perception of simulated surface textures via vibratory and force feedback displays. Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, 61, 55-60.
30. Weisenberger, J. M., Krier, M. J., & Rinker, M. A. (1998). Resolution of virtual grating orientation with 2-DOF and 3-DOF force feedback systems. In R. J. Furness (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Vol. 64, pp. 295-301). New York: ASME.
31. Weisenberger, J. M., Krier, M. J., & Rinker, M. A. (2000). Judging the orientation of sinusoidal and square-wave virtual gratings presented via 2-DOF and 3-DOF haptic interfaces. Haptics-e, 1(4), http://www.haptics-e.org.
32. Weisenberger, J. M., Krier, M. J., Rinker, M. A., & Kreidler, S. M. (1999). The role of the end-effector in the perception of virtual surfaces presented via force-feedback haptic interfaces. In N. Olgac (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Vol. 67, pp. 35-41): ASME.
33. West, A. M., & Cutkosky, M. R. (1997). Detection of real and virtual fine surface features with a haptic interface and stylus. In G. Rizzoni (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Vol. 61, pp. 159-166). New York: ASME.