Language assessment from a wider context

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 779-794

  Kunnan, Antony John ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750924214     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-59     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council for Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Bersoff, D. (1981). Testing and the law. American Psychologist, 36, 1,047-1,056.
5. Burns, E. (1998). Test accommodations for students with disabilities. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
6. Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Canale, M. (1988). The measurement of communicative competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 67-84.
8. Chapelle, C. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 254-272.
9. Corson, D. (1997). Critical realism: An emancipatory philosophy for applied linguistics? Applied Linguistics, 18, 166-188.
10. Cronbach, L. (1980). Validity on parole: How can we go straight? New directions for testing and measurement: Measuring achievement over a decade. Proceedings of the 1979 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 99-108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Cronbach, L. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing [fourth Edition]. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Crouse, J., & Trusheim, D. (1988). The case against the SAT. University of Chicago Press.
13. Cumming, A. (1997). Does language assessment facilitate recent immigrants' participation in Canadian society? TESL Canada 11,117-133.
14. Cumming, A., & Berwick, R. (1996). Validation in language testing. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
15. Davidson, F., & Lynch, B. (2002). Testcraft. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Davies, A. (1997). (Guest Ed.) Ethics in language testing. Language Testing, 14, 3.
17. Fulcher, G., & Bamford, R. (1996). I didn't get the grade I need: Where's my solicitor? System, 24,437-448.
18. Gould, G. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
19. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Ethics in language testing. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (Eds.), Language testing and assessment. Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Hanson, F. A. (1993). Testing testing: Social consequences of the examined life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Hawthorne, L. (1997). The political dimension of English language testing in Australia. Language Testing, 14,248-260.
22. Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (Eds.) (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. International Language Testing Association. (1995). Task Force on Testing Standards. Author.
24. International Language Testing Association. (2000). Code of Ethics. Author.
25. Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (1988). Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education. Author.
26. Kunnan, A. J. (1998). Approaches to validation. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 1-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Kunnan, A. J. (2000). Fairness and justice for all. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kunnan, A. J. (2002). (Ed.). Proceedings of the Language Assessment Ethics Conference, Pasadena, CA.
29. Kunnan, A. J. (2004). Test fairness. In M. Milanovic, C. Weir, & S. Bolton (Eds.), European Year of Language Conference Papers, Barcelona (pp. 27-48). Cambridge, UK: CUP.
30. Lemann, N. (1999). The big test. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
31. Linn, R., Baker, E. & Betebenner, D. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher 31,3-16.
32. Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent. London: Routledge.
33. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement. 3rd edition. (pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
34. McNamara, T. (1998). Policy and social considerations in language testing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, pp. 304-319.
35. McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Pitoniak, M., & Royer, J. (2001). Testing accommodations for examinees with disabilities: A review of psychometric, legal, and social policy issues. Review of Educational Research, 71, 53-104.
37. Read, J. (2001). The policy context for English testing for immigrants. In C. Elder et al., (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honor of Alan Davies (pp. 191-199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests. London, UK: Longman.
39. Singer, P. (1991). (Ed.), A companion to ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40. Spolsky, B. (1981). Some ethical questions about language testing. In C. Klein-Braley & D. Stevenson (Eds.), Practice and problems in language testing (pp. 5-21). Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.
41. Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Stansfield, C. (1993). Ethics, standards, and professionalism in language testing. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 4, 2,189-206.
43. Stevenson, D. K. (1981). Language testing and academic accountability: On redefining the role of language testing in language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 19,15-30.
44. Taylor, C., Jamieson, J., Eignor, D., & Kirsch, I. (1998). The relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based TOEFL test tasks. TOEFL Research Report 61. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
45. Willingham, W., & Cole, N. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.