Collaborative architecture design and evaluation

Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 219-228

  Haynes, Steven R ^a   Skattebo, Amie L ^a   Singel, Jonathan A ^a   Cohen, Mark A ^b   Himelright, Jodi L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Architecture; Design; Evaluation; Integration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; EVALUATION; INTEGRATION; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; LOGIC DESIGN; ARCHITECTURE; DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURE DESIGN; ARCHITECTURE EVALUATION; HETEROGENEOUS ORGANIZATIONS; SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED EVALUATION; APPLICATION INTEGRATION; ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION; COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURES; COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTS; DISTRIBUTED EVALUATION; EVALUATION; EVALUATION RESULTS; INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE; PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS; SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES; UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS; WALKTHROUGHS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 33750922375     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1142405.1142440     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Ackerman, M. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between social requirements and technical flexibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 2000, 179-203.
2. Andriole, S.J. Fast, cheap requirements prototype, or else! Software, IEEE, 11 (2), 1994, 85.
3. Babar, M.A. and Gorton, I., Comparison of scenario-based software architecture evaluation methods, in First Asia-Pacific Workshop on Software Architectures and Component Technologies, (2004), 600-607.
4. Babar, M.A., Kitchenham, B., Zhu, L. and Jeffery, R., An exploratory study of groupware support for distributed software architecture evaluation process, in Software Engineering Conference, 2004. 11th Asia-Pacific, (2004), 222-229.
5. Babar, M.A., Zhu, L. and Jeffery, R., A framework for classifying and comparing software architecture evaluation methods, in Australian Software Engineering Conference, (Melbourne, Australia, 2004), 309.
6. Bass, L., Clements, P. and Kazman, R. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.
7. Beck, K. and Andres, C. Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2005.
8. Boehm, B.W. Software engineering economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1981.
9. Boehm, B.W. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 21 (5), 1988, 61.
10. Brooks, F.P. No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Computer, 20 (4), 1987, 10-19.
11. Carroll, J.M. Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
12. Carroll, J.M. Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, 1995.
13. Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. Paradox of the Active User, in Carroll, J.M. ed. Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987, 80-111.
14. Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., Chin, G. and Koenemann, J. Requirements development in scenario-based design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24, 1998, 1156-1170.
15. Checkland, P. Systems thinking, systems practice. J. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1981.
16. Clements, P., Kazman, R. and Klein, M. Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies. Addison-Wesley, Boston [Mass.]; London, 2001.
17. Daily, M., Howard, M., Jerald, J., Lee, C., Martin, K., McInnes, D. and Tinker, P., Distributed design review in virtual environments, in Proceedings of the Third international Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, (San Francisco, 2000), 57-63.
18. Damian, D., Lanubile, F. and Oppenheimer, H.L., Addressing the challenges of software industry globalization: the workshop on global software development, in The Workshop on Global Software Development, ICSE 2003, (Portland, OR, 2003), 793-794.
19. Dobrica, L. and Niemela, E. A survey on software architecture analysis methods. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 28 (7), 2002, 638.
20. Duggan, E.W. Generating systems requirements with facilitated group techniques. Human-Computer Interaction, 18 (4), 2003, 373-394.
21. Ebert, C., Parro, C.H., Suttels, R. and Kolarczyk, H., Improving validation activities in a global software development, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, (Toronto, 2001), 545-554.
22. Espinosa, J.A. and Carmel, E., The Effect of Time Separation on Coordination Costs in Global Software Teams: A Dyad Model, in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences (Hicss'04), (Waikaloa, HI, 2004), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
23. Gregoriades, A. and Sutcliffe, A. Scenario-based assessment of nonfunctional requirements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31 (5), 2005, 392-408.
24. Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, 37 (1), 1994, 92-105.
25. Grudin, J., Return on investment and organizational adoption, in Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2004), 324 - 327.
26. Guo, G., Atlee, J. and Kazman, R., A Software Architecture Reconstruction Method, in First Working IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA1), (San Antonio, TX, USA, 1999).
27. Haynes, S.R., Purao, S. and Skattebo, A.L., Situating evaluation in scenarios of use. in Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (Chicago, Illinois, 2004), ACM Press, 92-101.
28. Herbsleb, J.D. and Moitra, D. Global software development. Software, IEEE, 18 (2), 2001, 16.
29. Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S. and Greenhalgh, C. Object-Focused Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments. A CM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (4), 2000, 477-509.
30. Kazman, R., Bass, L., Abowd, G. and Webb, M., SAAM: a method for analyzing the properties of software architectures, in, (1994), 81-90.
31. Land, R., Improving quality attributes of a complex system through architectural analysis-a case study, in, (2002), 167-174.
32. Landauer, T.K. The trouble with computers: usefulness, usability, and productivity. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995.
33. Lau, I.Y.-M., Chiu, C.-Y. and Lee, S.-L. Communication and Shared Reality: Implications for the Psychological Foundations of Culture. Social Cognition, 19 (3), 2001, 350-371.
34. Lehto, J.A. and Marttiin, P., Experiences in System Architecture Evaluation: A Communication View for Architectural Design, in, (Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05), 2005), 312c.
35. Lichter, H., Schneider-Hufschmidt, M. and Zullighoven, H. Prototyping in industrial software projects-bridging the gap between theory and practice. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 20 (11), 1994, 825.
36. Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K. and Oyama, S. Fractured Ecologies: Creating Environments for Collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 18 (1), 2003, 51-84.
37. Maiden, N., Gizikis, A. and Robertson, S. Provoking creativity: imagine what your requirements could be like. Software, IEEE, 21 (5), 2004, 68.
38. McFadden, E., Hager, D., Elie, C. and Blackwell, J. Remote Usability Evaluation: Overview and Case Studies. International journal of human-computer interaction, 15 (3), 2002, 498-502.
39. Mockus, A. and Herbsleb, J., Challenges of global software development, in IEEE METRICS, (London, England, 2001), 182-184.
40. Mumford, E. Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change. Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 1996.
41. Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
42. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I. and Booch, G. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999.
43. Schön, D. and Bennett, J. Reflective Conversation with Materials, in Winograd, T. ed. Bringing Design to Software, Addison-Wesley, 1996, 171-189.
44. Schön, D. A. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York, 1983.
45. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. Participatory design: perspectives on systems design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associations Pub., Hillsdale, N.J., 1993.
46. Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation, in Tyler, R., Gagne, R. and Scriven, M. eds. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, Rand-McNally, Chicago, 1967, 39-83.
47. Wood, J. and Silver, D. Joint Application Development, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 1995.