Zero-knowledge watermark detector robust to sensitivity attacks

Proceedings of the Multimedia and Security Workshop 2006, MM and Sec'06

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 97-107

  Troncoso Pastoriza, Juan Ramón ^a   Pérez González, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Generalized Gaussian detector; Sensitivity attacks; Watermark detection; Zero knowledge

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; CRYPTOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SECURITY OF DATA;

GENERALIZED GAUSSIAN DETECTOR; SENSITIVITY ATTACKS; WATERMARK DETECTION; ZERO KNOWLEDGE;

DIGITAL WATERMARKING;

EID: 33750921850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1161366.1161383     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A. Adelsbach, S. Katzenbeisser, and A.-R. Sadeghi. Watermark detection with zero-knowledge disclosure. In Multimedia Systems, volume 9, pages 266-278. Spriger-Verlag, 2003.
2. A. Adelsbach, M. Rohe, and A.-R. Sadeghi. Overcoming the obstacles of zero-knowledge watermark detection. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia and Security Workshop, pages 46-55, Magdeburg, Germany, 2004.
3. A. Adelsbach, M. Rohe, and A.-R. Sadeghi. Non-interactive watermark detection for a correlation-based watermarking scheme. In Communications and Multimedia Security: 9th IFIP TC-6 TC-11International Conference, CMS 2005, volume 3677 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 129-139. Spriger-Verlag, September 2005.
4. A. Adelsbach and A.-R. Sadeghi. Zero-knowledge watermark detection and proof of ownership. In Information Hiding - 4th International Workshop, IHW 2001, volume 2137 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 273-288. Spriger-Verlag, 2001.
5. M. Barni and F. Bartolini. Watermarking Systems Engineering. Signal Processing and Communications. Marcel Dekker, 2004.
6. M. Bellare and O. Goldreich. On defining proofs of knowledge. In Proceedings of CRYPTO'92, volume 740 of Lecture, Notes in Computer Science, pages 390-420. Springer-Verlag, 1992.
7. M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In Proceedings of ACM Computer and Comm. Security, pages 62-73. ACM Press, 1993.
8. F. Boudot. Efficient proofs that a committed number lies in an interval. In EUROCRYPT 2000, volume 1807 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 431-444. Spriger-Verlag, 2000.
9. B. Chen and G. Wornell. Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47:1423-1443, May 2001.
10. P. Comesaña, L. Pérez-Freire, and F. Pérez- González. The blind newton sensitivity attack. In E. J. D. III and P. W. Wong, editors, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VIII, Proc. of SPIE, San José, USA, January 2006.
11. I. Cox, J. Kilian, T. Leighton, and T. Shamoon. A secure, robust watermark for multimedia. In R. Anderson, editor, Information Hiding-First International Workshop, volume 1174 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 175-190. Springer-Verlag, May/June 1996.
12. R. Cramer, I. Damgård, and B. Schoenmakers. Proofs of partial knowledge and simplified design of witness hiding protocols. In Proceedings of CRYPTO'94, volume 839 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 174-187. Spriger-Verlag, 1994.
13. S. Craver. Zero-knowledge watermark detection. In Information Hiding, pages 101-116, 1999.
14. I. Damgård. Commitment schemes and zero-knowledge protocols. In Lectures on data security, Modern Cryptology in Theory and Practise, volume 1561 of Lecture Notes in Comuter Science, pages 63-86. Springer-Verlag, July 1998.
15. I. Damgård and E. Fujisaki. A statistically-hiding integer commitment scheme based on groups with hidden order. In ASIACRYPT 2002: 8th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, volume 2501 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 125-142. Spriger-Verlag, December 2002.
16. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff. The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems. In SIAM Journal of Computing, volume 18, pages 186-208, 1989.
17. J. R. Hernández, M. Amado, and F. Pérez-González. Dct-domain watermarking techniques for still images: Detector performance analysis and a new structure. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(1):55-68, January 2000. Special Issue on Image and Video Processing for Digital Libraries.
18. H. Lipmaa. On diophantine complexity and statistical zero-knowledge arguments. In ASIACRYPT 2003, volume 2894 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 398-415. Spriger-Verlag, November 2003.
19. L. Pérez-Freire, P. Comesaña, and F. Pérez- González. Detection in quantization-based watermarking: performance and security issues. In E. J. D. III and P. W. Wong, editors, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VII, volume 5681 of Proc. of SPIE, pages 721-733, San José, USA, January 2005.
20. F. Pérez-González, F. Balado, and J. R. Hernández. Performance analysis of existing and new methods for data hiding with known-host information in additive channels. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51:960-980, April 2003.
21. A. Piva, V. Cappellini, D. Corazzi, A. D. Rosa, C. Orlandi, and M. Barni. Zero-knowledge st-dm watermarking. In E. J. D. III and P. W. Wong, editors, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VIII, SPIE, San José, California, USA, January 2006.