The cultural dimension of social movements: A theoretical reassessment and literature review

Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 87-100

  Hart, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750920489     PISSN: 10694404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3712006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alexander, J., and P. Smith. 1993. The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory mid Society 22:151-207.
2. Bellah, R., R. Madscn, A. Swidlcr, W. Sullivan, and S. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
3. Benford, R. 1993a. Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces 71:677-701.
4. _. 1993b. "You could be the hundredth monkey": Collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. Sociological Quarterly 34:195-216.
5. Benford, R., and S. Hunt. 1992. Dramaturgy and social movements: The social construction and communication of power. Sociological Inquiry 62: 36-55.
6. Fantasia, R. 1988. Cultures of solidarity: Consciousness, action, aivl contemporary American Wirkern. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
7. Geertz, C. 1973. Ideology as a cultural system. The inter/rotation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
8. Ginsburg, F. D. 1989. ContesteJ lit'cs: The abortion debate in an American community. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
9. Hart, S. 1992. What does the Lord, require! Hou' American Christians think about economic justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Klandermans, B. 1992. The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In Frontiers in social movement theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller, 77-103. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. McCarthy, J. D. 19S7. Pro-life and pro-choice mobilization: Infrastructure deficits and new technologies. In Social movements in an organizational society, edited by M. N. Zald and J.D. McCarthy, 49-66. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
12. Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1991. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 41-62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Morris, A. D. 1992. Political consciousness and collective action. In Frontiers in social movement theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller, 351-373. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14. Morris, A. D., and C. M. Mueller, eds. 1992. Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Sewell, W. J., Jr. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:1-29.
16. Smelser, N. J. 1959. Social cfiange in the industrial revolution: An application of theory to the British cotton industry, 1770-1840. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Snow, D., E. B. Rochford, S. Worden, and R. Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Kevicu' 51:464-81.
18. Snow, D., and R. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1:197-217.
19. _. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. In Frontiers in social movement theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller, 133-55. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20. Tarrow, S. 1992. Mentalities, political cultures, and collective action frames: Constructing meanings through action. In Frontiers in social movement theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller, 174-202. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21. Thompson, E. P. 1963. The makitigo/the English u'orfcing class. New York: Vintage.
22. Wuthnow, R. 1987. Meaning and moral order. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.