L'euroisation des pays d'europe centrale et orientale dans la perspective de leur adhésion a` l'union économique et monétaire

Revue d'Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 27-55

  Schoors, Koen ^a  

^a LICOS (Leuven Institute for Central and Eastern European Studies)   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750919784     PISSN: 03380599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3406/receo.2000.3055     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. BACKE P. (1997), Interlinkages Between European Monetary Union and a Future EU Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe, Review of Economics in Transition, no 2, Bank of Finland.
2. BACKE P. & RADZYNER O. (1998), The Introduction of the Euro: Implications for Central and Eastern Europe. The Case of Hungary and Slovenia, Focus on Transition, no 1, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Wien.
3. BAYOUMI B. & EICHENGREEN B. (1992), Is there a conflict between EC enlargement and European monetary unification?, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 646, May.
4. BAYOUMI B. & EICHENGREEN B. (1993), Shocking aspects of European monetary integration, in F. Giavazzi & F. Torres, Eds., Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 193-230.
5. BAYOUMI B. & EICHENGREEN B. (1994), One Money or Many? Analyzing the Prospects for Monetary Unification in Various Parts of the World, Princeton Studies in International Finance, no 76, September.
6. BAYOUMI B. & MASSON P. (1995), Fiscal Flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for Monetary Union in Europe, European Economic Review, Vol. 39, no 2, February, pp. 253-274.
7. BEKX P. (1998), The Implications of the Introduction of the Euro for Non-EU Countries, European Commission Euro Papers, no 26, July.
8. BENASSY-QUERE A. & LAHRECHE-REVIL A. (1998), Pegging the CEEC's Currencies to the Euro, CEPll Document de Travail, no 98-04.
9. BERG A. & BORENSZTEIN M. (2000), The Pros and Cons of Full Dollarization, IMF Policy Discussion Paper, no WP/00/50, March 1.
10. BOONE L. & MAUREL M. (1999a), Economic Convergence of the CEECs with the EU, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 2018, London.
11. BOONE L. & MAUREL M. (1999b), An OCA perspective of the EU enlargement to the CEEC's, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 2119, London.
12. BOONE L. & MAUREL M. (1999e), L'ancrage de l'Europe centrale et orientale al'Union euroṕenne, Revue Economique, vol. 50, no 6, pp. 1123-1137.
13. BOGETIC Z. & SCHULER K. (1999), Official Dollarization, IM April 20, mimeo.
14. BORENSZTEIN E. & MASSON P. R. (1993), Financial Sector Reforms and Exchange Arrangements in Eastern Europe, Part II: Exchange Arrangements of Previously Centrally Planned Economies, IMF Occasional Paper, no 102, February.
15. BRATKOWSKI A. & ROSTOWSKI J. (1999), Unilateral adoption of the Euro by EU applicant countries: The macroeconomic aspects, CASE-CEU Working Papers, no 26.
16. BUITER W. H. (1999), 'The EMU and the NAMU: What is the Case for North American Monetary Union?, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 2181, London.
17. CALVO G. (1999), Argentina's Dollarization Project: A Primer, disponible sur la Toile : www.bsos.edii/econ/ciecalvo.htm
18. CANZONERI M., VALLES J. & VINALS J. (1996), Do Exchange Rates Move to Address International Macroeconomic Imbalances?, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 1498, London, October.
19. CiiAMiE N., SERRES A. DE & LALANDE R. (1994), Optimum currency areas and shock asymmetry: A comparison of Europe and the United States, Bank of Canada Working Paper, no 94/1, January.
20. DE GRAUWE P. (1992), The Economics of Monetary Integration, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
21. EiCHENGREEN B. (1992), Should the Maastricht Treaty Be Saved?, Princeton Studies in International Finance, no 74, December.
22. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1997), Economic Policy in EMU. Part B: Specific Topics, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, Economic Papers, no 126, November.
23. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1998), The Euro: Explanatory Notes, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, Economic Papers, February.
24. FORM M. & REICHLIN L. (1997), National Policies and Local Economies: Europe and the United States, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 1632, London.
25. FRANKEL J. & ROSE A. K. (1997), Is EMU More Justifiable Ex post than Ex anteT, European Economic Review, Vol. 41, no 3-5 , April, pp. 753-760.
26. FRANKEL J. & ROSE A. K. (1998), The endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria, Economic Journal, Vol. 108, no 449, pp. 1009-1025.
27. FRANKEL J. (1999), No single currency regime is right for all countries or at all times, NBER Working Paper, no 7338, September.
28. FREUDENBERG M. & LEMOINE F. (1999), Central and Eastern European Countries in the International Division of Labour in Europe, CEPII Document de Travail, no 99-05.
29. GRASSINGER R. (1999), From EMS to EMU: The Cost of Relinquishing Nominal Exchange Rates, paper presented at the EEA-congress, Santiago de Compostela, September 1999.
30. GROS D. (2000), Who Needs an External Anchor?, manuscrit non publié, mai.
31. HANKE S. H. & SCHULER K. (1999), A Monetary Constitution for Argentina: Rules for Dollarization, Cato Journal, Vol. 18, no 3, pp. 405-419.
32. IMF (1996), Progress Toward EMU - Developments and Selected Issues, Staff Paper, no SM/96/41, Washington, D.C., February.
33. IMF (1997), World Economic Outlook, Washington, D.C., October.
34. INSTITUT FUR EUROPaISCHE POLITIK (1998), Enlargement/Agenda 2000 - Watch, Pilot Issue, October, Bonn.
35. KOHLER H. & WES M. (1999), Implications of the Euro for the Integration Process of the Transition Economies in Central and Eastern Europe, EBRD Working Paper, no 38, March.
36. KOPITS G. (1999), Implications of EMU for Exchange Rate PoHcy in Central and Eastern Europe, IMF Working Paper, no WP/99/9, January.
37. KRUGMAN P. (1993), Lessons from Massachusetts for EMU, in F. Giavazzi & F. Torres, Eds., The Transition to Economic and Monetary Union in Europe, New York : Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-261.
38. LAMDANY R. & DORLHIAC J. (1987), The Dollarization of a Small Economy, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 89, no 1, pp. 91-102.
39. LANE T. (1991), Inflation Stabilization and Economic Transformation in Poland: The First Year, IMF Working Paper, no WP/91/70, July.
40. MASSON P. R. & TAYLOR M. P. (1992), Common Currency Areas and Currency Unions: An Analysis of the Issues, CEPR Discussion Paper, no 644, London.
41. MASSON P. R. (1999), Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy of Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe after the Launch of EMU, IMF Policy Discussion Paper, no PDP/99/5, July.
42. Me KINNON R. I. (1963), Optimum Currency Areas, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, no 4, September, pp. 717-725.
43. MUNDELL R. A. (1961), A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas's, American Economic Review, Vol. 51, no 4, September, pp. 657-665.
44. TEMPRANO-ARROYO H. & FELDMAN R. (1998), Selected Transition and Mediterranean Countries: An Institutional Primer on EMU and EU Relations, IMF Working Paper, no WP/98/82, June.