An evaluation of availability latency in carrier-based vehicular ad-hoc networks

MobiDE 2006: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 75-82

  Ghandeharizadeh, Shahram ^a   Kapadia, Shyam ^a   Krishnamachari, Bhaskar ^a  

^a University of Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

AutoMata; Data carriers; Latency; Markov model; Mobility; Replacement policy; Vehicular networks

Indexed keywords

CARRIER COMMUNICATION; CLIENT SERVER COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; POPULATION STATISTICS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SERVERS;

DATA CARRIERS; REPLACEMENT POLICY; VEHICULAR NETWORKS; VIDEO CLIPS;

TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

EID: 33750918289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Federal Highway Administration. Corridor simulation. Version 5.1, http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/corsim.htm.
2. D. Aldous and J. Fill. Reversible markov chains and random walks on graphs. Under preparation.
3. A. Bar-Noy, I. Kessler, and M. Sidi. Mobile Users: To Update or Not to Update. In IEEE Infocom, 1994.
4. J. Burgess, B. Gallagher, D. Jensen, and B. Levine. MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networking. In IEEE Infocom, April 2006.
5. E. Cohen and S. Shenker. Replication Strategies in Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks. In SIGCOMM, 2002.
6. A. Dan, D. Dias, R. Mukherjee, D. Sitaram, and R. Tewari. Buffering and Caching in Large-Scale Video Servers. In COMPCON, 1995.
7. S. Ghandeharizadeh, S. Kapadia, and B. Krishnamachari. PAVAN: A Policy Framework for Content Availabilty in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks. In VANET, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.
8. S. Ghandeharizadeh, S. Kapadia, and B. Krishnamachari. Comparison of Replication Strategies for Content Availability in C2P2 networks. In MDM, May 2005.
9. S. Ghandeharizadeh, S. Kapadia, and B. Krishnamachari. An Evaluation of Availability Latency in Carrier-based Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Southern Califomia,CENG-2006-1, 2006.
10. S. Ghandeharizadeh and B. Krishnamachari. C2p2: A peer-to-peer network for on-demand automobile information services. In Globe. IEEE, 2004.
11. T. Hara. Effective Replica Allocation in Ad Hoc Networks for Improving Data Accessibility. In IEEE Infocom, 2001.
12. H. Hayashi, T. Hara, and S. Nishio. A Replica Allocation Method Adapting to Topology Changes in Ad Hoc Networks. In DEXA, 2005.
13. P. Juang, H. Old, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. Peh, and D. Rubenstein. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, 2002.
14. A. Pentland, R. Fletcher, and A. Hasson. DakNet: Rethinking Connectivity in Developing Nations, Computer, 37(1):78-83, 2004.
15. F. Sailhan and V. Issarny. Cooperative Caching in Ad Hoc Networks. In MDM, 2003.
16. R. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, and W. Brunette. Data mules: Modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks Journal, 1, September 2003.
17. T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, and C. Raghavendia. Single-Copy Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks. In SECON, April 2004.
18. A. Tanenbaum. Modern Operating Systems, 2nd Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.4 . Prentice Hall, 2001.
19. A. Vahdat and D. Becker. Epidemic routing for partially-connected ad hoc networks. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Duke University, 2000.
20. W. Zhao, M. Ammar, and E. Zegura. A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks. In MobiHoc, pages 187-198, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.
21. M. Zonoozi and P. Dassanayake. User Mobility Modeling and Characterization of Mobility Pattern. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15:1239-1252, September 1997.