Accuracy of 64-slice CT for detecting coronary stenosis: Comparison with coronary angiography

Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1472-1476

  Jiang, Xue Xiang ^a   Qiu, Jian Xing ^a   Liu, Jian ^a   Wang, Ji Chen ^a   Gao, Li ^a   Sun, Xiao Wei ^a   Qin, Nai Shan ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY FIRST HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Tomography, X ray computed

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33750894138     PISSN: 10033289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography [J]. Circulation, 2002, 106(16): 2051-2054.
2. Becker C, Knez A, Leber A, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2002, 26(5): 750-755.
3. Qiu JX, Tang GJ, Gao FS, et al. Coronary artery stenosis: comparison study of CT angiography with 16-detector rows scanner and convention angiography [J]. Chin J Radiol, 2005, 39(10): 1046-1049
4. Wang ZQ, Yang ZQ, Zhu H, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice spiral CT: comparison with catheterization coronary angiography[J]. Radiol Practice, 2005, 20(3): 190-194.
5. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Accuracy of thin slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses [J]. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(12): 1043-1048.
6. Yang MF, Wang RP, He Q. Coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral CT: a study of technique and clinical application [J]. J Pract Radiol, 2005, 21(9): 915-918.
7. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 46(1): 147-154.
8. Wang XM, Wu LB, Li ZJ, et al. The clinical application of 64-slice spiral CT in angiography of coronary artery[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2005, 39(11): 1201-1204.
9. Cheng XM, He GX, Tong SF, et al. Intravascular ultrasound characteristics of plaques in angiographic mildly coronary stenosis [J]. Chin J Arterioscler, 2004, 12(6): 701-703.
10. Flohr T, Schoepf UJ, Kuettner A, et al. Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems[J]. Acad Radiol, 2003, 10(4): 386-401.
11. Lv B, Zhuang N, Dai RP, et al. Comparison of intravenous electron-beam coronary angiography and calcium scoring versus risk factors for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenosis [J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2004, 32(6): 492-496.
12. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 94(4): 427-430.
13. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(6): 1224-1229.
14. Song W, Jin SX, Du YP, et al. The clinical value of sixteen-detector row computed tomography angiography for the assessment of coronary artery bypass graft [J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2005, 33(8): 704-707.