"All the rest is normal". A pilot study on the communication between physician and patient in prenatal diagnosis

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 127-130

  Zecca, G ^a   Gradi, E C ^a   Nilsson, K ^a   Bellotti, M ^b   Dal Verme, S ^b   Vegni, Elena ^a,c   Moja, E A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c SAN PAOLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Disease severity; Doctor patient relation; Prenatal diagnosis; RIAS; Videotape recording

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ECHOGRAPHY; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

AMNIOCENTESIS; COMMUNICATION; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; HUMANS; ITALY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 33750877275     PISSN: 0167482X     EISSN: 17438942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02688690500305753     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Buckman R. Breaking bad news-Why is so difficult? BMJ 1984;288:1597-1599.
2. Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet 2004;363:312-319.
3. Ford S, Fallowfield L, Lewis S. Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:1511-1519.
4. WHO. Introducing parents to their abnormal baby. Geneva: Division of Mental Health; 1993.
5. Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation. An approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985.
6. Inui TS, Carter W, Kukull W, et al. Outcome-based doctor-patient interaction analysis. Part 1. Comparison of techniques. Med Care 1982;20:535-549.
7. Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, et al. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995;40:903-918.
8. Stiles WB, Putnam SM. Coding categories for investigating medical interviews: a metaclassification In: Lipkin M Jr, Putnam SM, Lazare A, editors. The medical interview. Clinical care, education and research. New York: Springer; 1995. pp 489-494.
9. Roter D. The Roter method of interaction process analysis. RIAS Manual. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University; 1991.
10. Roter D, Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2002;46:243-251.
11. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model, a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129-136.
12. Roter D, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA 1997;277:350-356.