Osteopontin reduces polyspermy during in vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes

Biology of Reproduction

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 726-733

  Hao, Yanhong ^a   Mathialagan, Nagappan ^b   Walters, Eric ^a   Mao, Jiude ^a   Lai, Liangxue ^a   Becker, Donald ^a   Li, Wensheng ^a   Critser, John ^a   Prather, Randall S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b MONSANTO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fertilization; In vitro fertilization; Oocyte; Osteopontin; Oviduct; Pig; Polyspermy; Sperm; Spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

OSTEOPONTIN; PREGNANCY ASSOCIATED PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL VIABILITY; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; MALE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OVIDUCT; POLYSPERMY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRONUCLEUS; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SWINE; WESTERN BLOTTING; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

ANIMALS; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; MALE; OOCYTES; OSTEOPONTIN; PREGNANCY PROTEINS; SPERMATOZOA; SWINE; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33750872023     PISSN: 00063363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.052589     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Cantley TC, Day BN. Effects of pocyte maturation media on development of pig embryos produced by in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 111:101-108.
2. Han YM, Abeydeera LR, Wang WH, Petersen AL, Kim JH, Murphy C, Day BN, Prather RS. Pronuclear location before the first cell division determines ploidy of polyspermic pig embryos. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:1340-1346.
3. Xia P. Biology of polyspermy-introduction. Microsc Res Tech 2003; 61:325-326.
4. Hunter RHF. The effects of delayed insemination on fertilization and cleavage in the pig. J Reprod Fertil 1967; 13:133-147.
5. Hunter RHF. Fertilization of pig eggs in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 40(suppl):211-226.
6. Hunter RHF. Oviduct function in pigs, with particular reference to the pathological condition of polyspermy. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 29:385-391.
7. Nagai T, Moor RM. Effect of oviduct cells on the incidence of polyspermy in pig eggs fertilized in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 26:377-382.
8. Wang WH, Uchida M, Niwa K. Effect of follicle on in-vitro penetration of pig oocytes by cryopreserved, ejaculated spermatozoa. J Reprod Dev 1992; 38:125-131.
9. Kirn NH, Funahashi H, Aheydeera LR, Moon SJ, Prather RS, Day BN. Effects of oviductal fluid on sperm penetration and cortical granule exocytosis during fertilization of pig oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1996; 107:79-86.
10. Funahashi H, Day BN. Effects of follicular fluid at fertilization in vitro on sperm penetration in pig oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 99:97-103.
11. Funahashi H, Fujiwara T, Nagai T. Modulation of the function of boar spermatozoa via adenosine and fertilization promoting peptide receptors reduce the incidence of polyspermic penetration into porcine oocytes. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1157-1163.
12. Abeydeera LR, Day BN. Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocytes inseminated in a modified Tris-buffered medium with frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:729-734.
13. Li YH, Ma W, Li M, Hou Y, Jiao LH, Wang WH. Reduced polyspermic penetration in porcine oocytes inseminated in a new in vitro fertilization (IVF) system: straw IVF. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:1580-1585.
14. Funahashi H. Polyspermic penetration in porcine IVM-IVF systems. Reprod Fertil Dev 2003; 15:167-177.
15. Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Osteopontin: roles in implantation and placentation. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:1458-1471.
16. Garlow JE, Ka H, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Jaeger LA, Bazer FW. Analysis of osteopontin at the maternal-placental interface in pigs. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:718-725.
17. Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Jaeger LA, Ka H, Garlow JE, Pfarrer C, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC. Muc-1, integrin, and osteopontin expression during the implantation cascade in sheep. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:820-828.
18. Green JA, Parks TE, Avalle MP, Telugu BP, McLain AL, Peterson AJ, McMillan W, Mathialagan N, Hook RR, Xie SC, Roberts RM. The establishment of an ELISA for the detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) in the serum of pregnant cows and heifers. Theriogenology 2005; 63:1481-1503.
19. Im GS, Lai LX, Liu ZH, Hao YH, Wax D, Bonk A, Prather RS. In vitro development of preimplantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos cultured in different media and gas atmospheres. Theriogenology 2004; 61:1125-1135.
20. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM, Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:112-119.
21. Hagen DR, Prather RS, Sims MM, First NL. Development of one-cell porcine embryos to the blastocyst stage in simple media. J Anim Sci 1991; 69:1147-1150.
22. Abeydeera LR. In vitro production of embryos in swine. Theriogenolosy 2002; 57:257-273.
23. Sutovsky P. Visualization of sperm accessory structures in the mammalian spermatids, spermatozoa, and zygotes by immunofluorescence, confocal, and immunoelectron microscopy. In: Schatten H, (ed.). Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 253. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2003:59-77.
24. Katayama M, Koshida M, Miyake M. Fate of the acrosome in ooplasm in pigs after IVF and ICSI. Human Reprod 2002; 17:2657-2664.
25. Walters EM, Men H, Agca Y, Mullen SF, Critser ES, Critser JK. Osmotic tolerance of mouse spermatozoa from various genetic backgrounds: acrosome integrity, membrane integrity, and maintenance of motility. Cryobiology 2005; 50:193-205.
26. Kouba AJ, Abeydeera LR, Alvarez IM, Day BN, Buhi WC. Effects of the porcine oviduct-specific glycoprotein on fertilization, polyspermy, and embryonic development in vitro. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:242-250.
27. Cancel AM, Chapman DA, Killian GJ. Osteopontin localization in the Holstein bull reproductive tract. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:454-460.
28. Siiteri JE, Ensrud KM, Moore A, Hamilton DW. Identification of osteopontin (OPN) mRNA and protein in the testis and epididymis, and on sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 40:16-28.
29. Cran DG, Cheng WTK. The conical reaction in pig oocytes during in vivo and in vitro fertilization. Gamete Res 1986; 13:241-251.
30. Vatzias G, Hagen DR. Effects of porcine follicular fluid and oviduct-conditioned media on maturation and fertilization of porcine oocytes in vitro. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:42-48.
31. Kim NH, Day BN, Lim JG, Lee HT, Chung KS. Effects of oviductal fluid and heparin on fertility and characteristics of porcine spermatozoa. Zygote 1997; 5:61-65.
32. Dubuc A, Sirard MA. Effect of coculturing spermatozoa with oviductal cells on the incidence of polyspermy in pig in vitro fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 41:360-367.
33. Kano K, Miyano T, Kato S. Effect of oviductal epithelial cells on fertilization of pig oocytes in vitro. Theriogenology 1994; 42:1061-1068.
34. Downs SM, Eppig JJ. Serum maintains the fertilizability of mouse oocytes matured in vitro by preventing hardening of the zona pellucida. Gamete Res 1986; 15:115-122.
35. Yanagimachi R. Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press: 1994: 261-268.
36. Wang WH, Day BN, Wu GM. How does polyspermy happen in mammalian oocytes? Microsc Res Tech 2003; 61:335-341.
37. Schroeder AC, Schultz RM, Kopf GS, Taylor FR, Becker RB, Eppig JJ. Fetuin inhibits zona pellucida hardening and conversion of ZP2 to ZP2f during spontaneous mouse oocyte maturation in vitro in the absence of serum. Biol Reprod 1990; 43:891-897.
38. Gabler C, Chapman DA, Killian GJ. Expression and presence of osteopontin and integrins in the bovine oviduct during the oestrous cycle. Reproduction 2003; 126:721-729.
39. Luedtke CC, McKee MD, Cyr DG, Gregory M, Kaartinen MT, Mui J, Hermo L. Osteopontin expression and regulation in the testis, efferent ducts, and epididymis of rats during postnatal development through to adulthood. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:1437-1448.
40. Killian GJ, Chapman DA, Rogowski LA. Fertility-associated proteins in Holstein bull seminal plasma. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:1202-1207.
41. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Prather RS, Day BN. Morphologic comparison of ovulated and in vitro-matured porcine oocytes, with particular reference to polyspermy after in vitro fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 49:308-316.
42. McLeskey SB, Dowds C, Carballada R, White RR, Saling PM. Molecules involved in mammalian sperm-egg interaction. Int Rev Cytol 1998; 177:57-113.
43. Wassarman PM. Gamete interactions during mammalian fertilization. Theriogenology 1994; 41:31-44.
44. Schmell ED, Gulyas BJ, Hedrick JL. Egg surface changes during fertilization and the molecular mechanism of the block to polyspermy. In: Hartmans JF, (ed.). Mechanism and Control of Animal Fertilization. New York: Academic Press: 1983:365-413.
45. Raz T, Skutelsky E, Shalgi R. Post-fertilization changes in the zona pellucida alycoproteins of rat eggs. Histochem Cell Biol 1996; 106:395-403.