Using the productive pedagogies framework to build a community of learners online in mathematics education

Distance Education

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 355-369

  Chinnappan, Mohan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750857321     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910600940430     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Australian Council of Deans of Education (ACDE). (1998). Preparing a profession: Report of the national standards and guidelines for initial teacher education project. Canberra: ACDE.
2. Berge, Z. (1998). Guiding principles in Web-based instructional design. Education Media International, 35(2), 72-76.
3. Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
4. Cronin, R., & Yelland, N. (2004). Achieving positive outcomes in numeracy for young indigenous students. Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 11(2), 99-109.
5. Gore, J. G. (2001). Beyond our differences: A reassembling of what matters in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 124-135.
6. Gore, J. G., & Morrison, K. A. (2001). The perpetuation of a (semi-)profession: Challenges in the governance of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 567-582.
7. Graham M., & Scarborough, H. (2001). Enhancing the learning environment for distance education students. Distance Education, 22(2), 232-244.
8. Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276-295). New York: Macmillan.
9. Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P. & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
10. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2005). Discourses as a catalyst for facilitating practitioner research. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (vol. 2, pp. 427-434). Sydney, Australia: Merga Inc.
11. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 98-122.
12. Izsak, A. (2004). Teaching and learning two-digit multiplication: Coordinating analyses of classroom practices and individual student learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(1), 37-79.
13. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Towards a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(3), 34-37.
14. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 45(1), 65-95.
15. Kofoed, J. (2004). Can students improve performance by clicking more? Engaging students through online delivery. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 1(2), 9-18.
16. Littleton, K. & Light, P. (1998). Learning with computers: Analysing productive interactions. London: Routledge.
17. McConnell, D. (2002). Action research and distributed problem-based learning in continuing professional education, Distance Education, 23(1), 59-83.
18. McLellan, H. (1997). Creating virtual communities via the Web. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 185-190). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
19. Murphy, K. L., Mahoney, S. E., Chen, C. Y., Mendoza-Diaz, N. V., & Yang, X. (2005). A constructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussions. Distance Education, 26(3), 341-366.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
21. National Project on the Quality of Teaching and Learning (NPQTL). (1996). National competency framework for beginning teaching. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
22. Nicoll, K., & Harrison, R. (2003). Constructing the good teacher in higher education: The discursive work of standards. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(1), 23-35.
23. Oliver, R. (1999). Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education, 20(2), 240-254.
24. Putnam, R. T., Lampert, M., & Peterson, P. L. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education, vol. 16 (pp. 57-150). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
25. Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study (QSRLS). (1999). School reform longitudinal study: Report, March 1999. St Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Graduate School of Education.
26. Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality matters. Revitalising teaching: Critical times, critical choices, Report of the Review of Teacher Education. Sydney, Australia: NSW Department of Education and Training.
27. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
28. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professional think in action. London: Temple Smith.
29. Schrage, M. (1991). Shared mind: The new technologies of collaboration. New York: Random House.
30. Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.