Adolescent and parent perceptions on youth participation in risk behavior research

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 160, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1159-1166

  Pasternak, Ryan H ^a   Geller, Gail ^b   Parrish, Catherine ^c   Cheng, Tina L ^d  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JUVENILE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 33750815451     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: 10724710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.11.1159     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Reif CJ, Elster AB. Adolescent preventive services. Prim Care. 1998;25:1-21.
2. Scarr S. Ethical problems in research on risky behaviors and risky populations. Ethics Behav. 1994;4:147-155.
3. Wilfond BS, Geller G, Lerman C, Audrain-McGovern J, Shields AE. Ethical issues in conducting behavioral genetics research: the case of smoking prevention trials among adolescents. J Health Care Law Policy. 2002;6:73-88.
4. Glantz LH. Nontherapeutic research with children: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1070-1073.
5. Gardner W, Wilcox BL. Political intervention in scientific peer review: research on adolescent sexual behavior. Am Psychol. 1993;48:972-983.
6. CN v Ridgewood Board of Education, 319 F2d 483 (NJ 2004).
7. Mammel KA, Kaplan DW. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17:323-330.
8. Kopelman LM. Pediatric research regulations under legal scrutiny: Grimes narrows their interpretation. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30:38-49.
9. Mastroianni AC, Kahn JP. Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1073-1076.
10. Pearce M. Children as subjects in nontherapeutic research: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc. J Leg Med. 2002;23:421-436.
11. McHale JV. Guidelines for medical research: some ethical and legal problems. Med Law Rev. 1993;1:160-185.
12. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978. DHEW publication (OS) 78-0012.
13. Santelli JS, Smith Rogers A, Rosenfeld WD, et al; Society for Adolescent Medicine. Guidelines for adolescent health research: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2003;33:396-409.
14. Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services. Special protections for children as research subjects: children involved as subjects in research: guidance on the HHS 45 CFR 46.407 ("407") review process. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/children/ guidance_407process.html. Accessed June 7, 2005.
15. Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc, 782 A2d 807 (Md 2001).
16. Roeder KH, Martin SH, Rees JS. Maryland Court ruling sets precedent on research involving minors: Grimes v Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc. GHA Today. 2001;45:3, 8.
17. Kalita SM. Fairfax cancels student survey on sex, drugs company distributing the questionnaire feared angry parents might file lawsuits. Washington Post. April 23, 2003;§B:B1.
18. Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, US House of Representatives. A Decade of Denial: Teens and AIDS in America. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1992.
19. Rogers AS, D'Angelo L, Futterman D. Guidelines for adolescent participation in research: current realities and possible resolutions. IRB. 1994;16:1-6.
20. Geller G, Tambor ES, Bernhardt BA, Fraser G, Wissow LS. Informed consent for enrolling minors in genetic susceptibility research: a qualitative study of at-risk children's and parents' views about children's role in decision-making. J Adolesc Health. 2003;32:260-271.
21. Brody JL, Annett RD, Scherer DG, Perryman DL, Cofrin KM. Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37:229-235.
22. Petersen AC, Leffert N. Developmental issues influencing guidelines for adolescent health research: a review. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17:298-305.
23. Boekeloo BO, Schiavo L, Rabin DL, Conlon RT, Jordan CS, Mundt DJ. Self-reports of HIV risk factors by patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic: audio vs written questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:754-760.
24. Cheng TL, Savageau JA, Sattler AL, DeWitt TG. Confidentiality in health care: a survey of knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes among high school students. JAMA. 1993;269:1404-1407.
25. Sikand A, Schubiner H, Simpson PM. Parent and adolescent perceived need for parental consent involving research with minors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:603-607.
26. Sigman G, Silber TJ, English A, Epner JE. Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 1997;21:408-415.
27. English A. Treating adolescents: legal and ethical considerations. Med Clin North Am. 1990;74:1097-1112.
28. English A. Guidelines for adolescent health research: legal perspectives. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17:277-286.
29. Santelli J. Human subjects protection and parental permission in adolescent health research. J Adolesc Health. 1997;21:384-387.
30. Santelli J, Rogers AS. Parental permission, passive consent, and "children" in research. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:303-304.
31. Santelli JS, Rosenfeld WD, DuRant RH, et al. Guidelines for adolescent health research: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17:270-276.
32. Levine RJ. Adolescents as research subjects without permission of their parents or guardians: ethical considerations. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17:287-297.
33. Eisenberg ME, Swain C, Bearinger LH, Sieving RE, Resnick MD. Parental notification laws for minors' access to contraception: what do parents say? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:120-125.
34. Jones RK, Purcell A, Singh S, Finer LB. Adolescents' reports of parental knowledge of adolescents' use of sexual health services and their reactions to mandated parental notification for prescription contraception. JAMA. 2005;293:340-348.